you are still missing the point
whats the point I’m guessing its that it can speak like Nato and that your “right”
the point is that you are contradicting yourself
you said yourself that the reason why the Su-30MKI can use NATO weaponry is that it is MIL-STD-1553 compliant
and so is the Mig-29SMT
1 Like
well If I said that its not that simple its much more complex not only the MIL-STD-1553 but radar pylons and a brick wall of Russia and USA never sharing ARH missiles
it very much is that simple the radar is MIL-STD-1553 compliant so it can communicate with the missiles
completly irrelevant to the discussion
1 Like
no.
prove me wrong then
bring a source
1 Like
source is how jets work which I don’t feel like explaining if you would like to see I’m sure YouTube has hundreds of videos about it
so you are making stuff up
as always
Sybau 🥀
3 Likes
Ad hominem?
no
stop hiding behind fancy words and bring your source
1 Like
FCC issues , data link transmitter issues , LAU-127 pylons , NATO Mode 5 IFF system , radar issues
still no source
1 Like
indonesia has gotten 3 single seat aircraft with 3 trainer/twin seater airframes, though it was confirmed to be all trainers now…
2 Likes
still they have the ability to carry armament?
1 Like
i am just looking forward to japan getting at least getting hammers alongside MICA’s
I cant leak classified docs so just go find a source since you know a RUSSIAN mig29SMT , mig35 , mig31 , Su30 ,Su35 will never actually have aim120s for the obvious reasons I don’t have anything else to say about this
they gave Hammers in the greek rafale so i see no problem
guys guess what greedy Lockheed saw Boeing eating well and decided to plan a new F16 and put a G behind it I hope It happens because F-16G seems pretty neat with AN/APG-85 radar peak ECM
Put it as reserve when it comes gaijin :)