As one of the people who directly goes through the major changelogs, dev server sections and all other sections of the forum to collect feedback for the majors and everything else, that’s just not the case. For example we’ve already been through the entire changelog topic as of today, to pass the devs everything of importance for tomorrow.
I appreciate not everything may come as wished, or not every suggestion may make it, but everything is seen.
Speaking of bug fixes it’s been a few months since the devs added the NOMADS and then proceeded to stop caring. Any chance they’ll finally add the RCWS gun sight so the thermals and laser rangefinder can finally be used?
So. 6 months for an ACKNOWLEDGED very simple clipping issue is not something to criticise?
8 months for a simple UI issue that was fixed in one update and broken the next.
and 8 months (over a year since plane was added) for an in cockpit ui issue.
Genuine question but where am i ment to turn for this? only 1 of them has been accepted and still nothing has been done for 6 months since it was accepted
Yes a lot of bug reports are fixed. its great. but it takes MONTHS for very very easily fixed things to get fixed. That is not sustainable. Im sorry but that is the truth, if you cant keep on top of things that have been an issue for over a year but use said vehicles in promotions there is an issue
Im not sure where it was said that nobody can be critical. In fact, I said the opposite:
I cant find were clusters are did they get cancelled or something guys
All there:
Very well. i will put my same criticsim in the update post and see. Ive done it many times. nothing have happened. I do appreciate the work you guys do. its a very volatile forum and the issues are not your fault, imo all the issues is with how the snail does it
i do appreciate that you have been more reasonable than other moderators where many of my light criticisms have been deleted.
(also to add, my criticism mostly focuses on one vehicle to show the depth of the issues. i could add more but it would dilute it by adding newer vehicles with issues that may be more game engine deep (even tho game engine issues are a whole other can of worms of why a vehicle shouldnt have been added))
I thought it was all vehicles NVM
Worth mentioning that just because it isn’t replied to, doesn’t mean it isn’t seen. You’ll see Smin a lot in this thread because a lot of people @ him in here.
There’s quite a few clusters that are missing so hopefully we see more in the future
It doesnt help that the only time ive gotten any staff atention has been with negative feedback in the wrong places. all genuine questions @ ing any staff has been ignored. i know the forums are very taxing on you all but like. when nothing happens despite a lot of movement, feedback, noise, and bug reports it gets real frustrating. And where are we realistically ment to put that? I dont dislike any of yall. you do a great job and prob get sick of ppl like me all the time but yeah. idk what else to do to get my genuine issues heard. But put it in the propper channels and will leave anny issues with the current states now and will return a few months from now to actually discuss the next update.
But yeah. this is my last in this thread. hope you all have a great day c:
(ima be real, having a bug reporting moderator look over some of my reports and mark the ones they could as fixed or duplicate before i placed the feedback in the right channel really doesnt do much to contradict my belief that putting stuff in the right threads gives zero results x3. im sure its just a syncronization issue tho)
In all honesty the Forum is a break for me, I moderate on the Discord ^^
Much more messages there, I like the forum more because people are much more detailed.
Oh gods. i didnt know there were an official wt discord. that must be hell
Like the spherical rwr for the JAS39E? I beg
/s but not completely /s
Its so peak, i already grinded the F/A-18D in Malaysia but this one is what i truly wanted. hundreds of games to be had in yet another Twin Seater <3
Hehe
i wish they would replace the 32 SM-2 blk 3b on Halsey with quad packed ESSM block 2’s
now that they added ESSM as a copy of the in game AMRAAM-ER, they cant exactly use that argument to deny sources for it to hit mach 4+ like it should
Since it uses the same stats as the AMRAAM-ER (which has incorrect rocket values), it only reaches about mach 2.6 MAX instead of Mach 4+.
