Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

⛊, 🛡
for the next time

1 Like

thank you

There are non-stop updates, but I can’t see one that will stop the madness of pushing tanks of weaker tiers against tanks of higher tiers. After a long time, I started playing tank battles again, which are becoming more and more frustrating day by day. I play with tier 7.0 tanks and the matchmaker constantly pushes me into matches in which, on the other hand, there are tanks of 7.7, 8.0 and even the incredible 8.3 tiers. Out of 30 matches, I play 27 matches against stronger tanks. I’m interested in whether those who don’t have premium are deliberately pushed onto a platter like clay pigeons to those who are pay to win players?

Oh yeah, even 8.3. Of course
IMG_20260702_081409_800


Oh no they are back…

what are you playing man

ground assault

people still play that? for what purpose lmao

if you win it gives a good boosters and in top tier they use it to grind the mods in the helis

could i use it to grind mods on tanks…? i do not like playing top tier (sepv3) without lrf and thermals lmao

yep, full rounds gives you a 300% once a day and 7-8k exp guaranteed, thats why, a literal saving grace for stock 10.0+ tanks

1 Like

3 Likes

unsurprisingly its a fomo 60 dollars pack, who could have said that cashing in the anniversary would make it happen

2 Likes

I’m not buying it personally, but I do like that this means they’re taking steps away from platform exclusivity. Now all they have to do is make these available on the respective other console too and we got a great structure to allow any player to be able to get any vehicle at least on rare occasions.

Pretty sure there was a similar thing for a Yak variant recently, that could be done the same way, or maybe some marketplace items like camos could be made available for GE purchase for console/DMM accounts and more. Improving accessibility is always a great move for a game to take.

5 Likes

is someone able to explain this to me, cause don’t get me wrong up untill recently and still in downtiers the f4s was legitimately insanely good. and i could understand the tradeoff of the better loadout would mean it would fight the su27 and f15 back when they came out, but now it doesn’t need a full uptier to get matches with them.

so why is it .3 below an f16a when its best loadout is significantly worse and only adds 1 missile and everything else about it is significantly worse. like why doesn’t it have like at least the 9l’s or at minimum have a 9j’s and get its BR increased along with everything else between 12.0 and 14.7?

Yea

1 Like

image
i get the fixing ARAT part, but what does the rest of these do lmao

2 Likes

Looks like a lot of buffs

basically nothing lmao

The Leclerc is in dire neef of a rework…

At first glance;

There should be no hole between glacis “beak” and UFP;
UFP should be as strong as the glacis “beak”,
It should accelerate FASTER and NOT SLOWER than Leopards.


Same goes for the Merkava Mk.4s. These 2000s behemoths having worse protection levels than 1980s MBTs simply can not be justified.


And Type 10s also need their acceleration AND steering fixed, as well as inner cheek armor holes.

2A7A1 has worse armor than 2A7V, the same way SEPv2 (Trophy) has worse armor than M1A2 SEPv3- except both SEPv3, and let alone the SEPv2s, have much, much, MUCH worse armor than 2A7V.

Even 2A7A1 will still have better armor than any Abrams.

I agree that Germany is in dire need of a new MBT, though; but I think 2A7A1 will do plenity fine for now.

Specially if Gaijin fixes the hull armor of the 2A7s;

670mm KE is an accurate value for 2E, 2A6HEL, etc- uparmored 2A6s, including the Strv 122s which, for some reason, Gaijins consider to have better armor than even the uparmored 2A7s.

Thing is, 2A7 itself received an improved INTERNAL armor composition; and then, 2A7V and 2A8, on top of that, the add-on package.

However, Gaijin is treating the 2A7s like they have the same armor as the 2A6s and only got the same armor package some countries had been operating since the early 2000s.

All in all, it should be:

2A5-6 FAMILY:
-2A5, 2A6: 440mm KE (base C-package)
-122s: 670mm KE (base C-package + MEXAS)
-2E, 2HEL: 670mm KE (base C-package + MEXAS)

2A7 FAMILY:
-2A7, 2A7A1: 550mm KE (improved internal armor)
-2A7V: 780mm KE (improved internal armor + MEXAS)

KMW

5 Likes