well was maybe the wrong trunnion removed? its lost its trunnion pins again and the breech armour from the old trunnion has just lost over 100mm of armour out of nowhere
Yup, and they said that they wouldn’t add long range missiles like that similar to Grom-1 but then added the AGM-84H.
Since tech tree tanks like M1A2 SEPV3 got Cammo netting, will other tanks like M1A2 SEPV2, Leo 2A7V, etc also get cammo netting?
Not in the near future no. The devs are very much aware of them though for future consideration.
Entirely possible other new vehicles may. However no spesific vehicles to announce currently.
I was honestly on gaijins side for this as it seemed pretty obsolete vs just allowing the likes of brimstone and similar to have their more practical modes.
standoff missiles allow CAS players to stick at comically far ranges outside of the grips of the best of SAMs gaijin has added, removes any kind of risk with plenty of reward. At least even a full blown self-targeting mode 3 brimstone has to be fired well within range of a SAM giving risk to reward.
Gaijins opened pandoras box, might as well add all of the possible standoffs at this point, will suck for GRB but would actually be really good for nuclear escalation (I assume that is why they are adding them)
heres photos from the dev to reference (not my photos)
1st dev
Spoiler

finalised
Spoiler

previous live server
Spoiler

this is the bug report that was marked as “fixed” when its trunnion pins got modelled but it never made it to live server and was just seemingly removed for some unknown reason
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Td4a5AfAezXQ
it still has the external pins but not the internal ones which hold everything together im pretty sure
@Smin1080p_WT
Halo Mr simin
I Have two question !
is their planes to rework old aircraft models ?
What happened to bombers damage model is there any updates?
This is the report that was fixed. The pins are present. It was confirmed with the developers they shouldn’t be present all the way into the structure. So the report is correctly concluded.
@Smin1080p_WT Could you please look at my bug report?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/efPDsrd965C7
Thanks
We already do this periodically. Quite a few aircraft were done in the last two years alone.
This is a seperate longer term plan BVV spoke about in the Q&A. Its still in our plans.
Hey. The team are checking reports all the time. It will be dealt with as soon as it can be.
Its been a week though?
We’ve just had a major update. Response times are longer than normal.
thats a very short ammount of time in gaijins eyes. theres multiple reports they have seemingly forgotten for 3 years
most of my bug reports have taken a month or so to be noticed and get an initial response unless i spoke to a tech mod about it (dont just randomly message tech mods) during a conversation on Discord.
just be patient
only 3 years? i know people with reports pending for much longer lol
how did they confirm it?
Fokker is one of the few interesting BeNeLux additions, but it doesn’t actually fill a capability gap, it’s just nice that’s it’s not a straight up imported copy-paste design.
There are plenty of issues with the lack of French air and ground designs being added, but it’s easy enough to just point to 2026 so far, as France is the only tree not to get a new domestic plane and/or tank all year
france’s top tier MBT just gets nerfed to the ground and is currently the worst top tier imo (yes worse than the ARIETE, atleast it can tank 30mm apds frontally unlike the leclerc lmao