what on earth happened here?
1 Like
The type of match I have when I’ve already had many bad matches before and am at my limit.
So far I think the vehicle was placed there because the weapon system was Chinese made. I don’t think there was ever an official statement about where Vietnamese vehicles would go, so until there’s more news it’s really up to guesswork.
Personally I don’t think it’s impossible there would be more Vietnamese vehicles added there, and at least it’s more likely than any other current techtree. I’ve seen Vietnam thrown around as a proposed subtree in the future planned Korean techtree too, but since that’s not in game yet you’d probably be well off playing China now even if Vietnam is added there.
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT Is there any chance we can get a developer’s response to when we would see corrected Aster-30 performance? Currently it underperforms in comparison to its real life performance by more than anything else in the game by a significant margin.
1 Like
Hey
Any updates or responses we get to the individual reports for any of the reported issues will of course be shared as soon as we have something to provide.
There is one special Tunisia map that whatever team brings more ADs or premium Do-335s win the match before fighters reach the battleground
There were plenty of attention and responses when the IRIS-T SLM less than a month after its addition into the game, but even after 9-10 months we can’t get some updates or responses on the Aster-30? I understand there were a lot more community input into the IRIS-T SLM which is understandable that it got some responses/updates, but I don’t understand why we can’t get any update on the Aster-30 nearly a year into its addition.
sky sabre getting the same treatment bro (neither are allowed to outperform the SM-SV)
Then speak up for Sky Sabre too. We all gotta speak up.
Smin why does the SU-39 get 6 ARM when its tech tree variant only gets 2 and dare i mention the 0 on the GR.1?
1 Like
There was generally quite a lot of reports on the IRIS-T SLM made in a very short period of time, with lots of overlapping issues. Comparatively, the Aster-30 has very few reports even when looking comparatively against other SPAA like the Skysabre. So sadly its not possible to make whole news post responses or coverage in the same way for all vehicles.
But as soon as we have any updates to provide on any open reports, we will indeed do so.
1 Like
i 100% agree but as much as i like Smin i dont believe there much he can to other than pass information to the devs
Different variants have different loadouts. Su-39 had differing weaponry to other Su-25 models.
okay but doesnt this go against premiums being a “sidegrade” to there tech tree variants and having a lot of ARM below 12.0
There are higher BR variants of the Su-25 family with greater capabilities than the Su-39 in the tree too. Its not simply about the quantity of one missile.
This is fair to say, but those few reports demonstrate that it underperforms in historical performance by a very significant margin. For example the reports show that the Aster-30 demonstrates a 90km kinetic horizontal range in-game when it should have 150km+ kinetic horizontal range, or that the Aster-30 should have 72G performance instead of 50G. The Aster-30’s performance in-game resembles nothing similar to its real-life performance.
3 Likes
okay but the SU-25SM3 isnt the tech tree counterpart to the SU-39 that would be the SU-25T which gets 4 less ARM, and that being the case 11.3 russia loses out on its arguably best CAS jet because its locked behind a paywall and in the SM3 case it loses its use because you have aircraft that do its job but better at the same br (the MIG-29KR and the SU-27SM)
There are not “direct tech tree counterparts” to every premium in the sense you are trying to frame. There is no rule that a premium cannot have different weaponry loadouts to a tree vehicle if it had access to them.
The Su-39 is a different variant intended for export and other programs. Thus it has differing weaponry. There are superior Su-25 platforms already within the tree at higher BRs.
Hey smin,
While you’re here, can you push this report to devs? It’s been three months and no fix, and with China sometimes getting put on BLUFOR in Nuclear Escalation, this bug has been infuriating to deal with.
no rule against that yeah but it has been said that premiums are meant to be sidegrades and take nothing away from the tech tree and on a technicality because the SU-39 and SU-25T are the same br the SU-39 does take something away from the tech tree being an 11.3 CAS jet with 6 ARM which i think is way to much btw considering the GR.1 isnt allowed 2 but thats a different conversation either way the SU-39 having 6 and the SU-25T only having 2 is going against what gaijin said about premiums taking nothing away from the tech tree and is also quite unbalanced which is why i believe it should get the same ammount as the SU-25T being 2