so you have it and can change the flag to Vietnam
so a certain someone complained about nothing then
also i didnt even knew it was a event vehicle until 15 minutes ago
so you have it and can change the flag to Vietnam
so a certain someone complained about nothing then
also i didnt even knew it was a event vehicle until 15 minutes ago
yea i use Vietnam or Kazakhstan
I think you misunderstood what I asked. I want to ask if the Vietnamese vehicle will be added to the Chinese tech tree, so I can choose which tech tree to grind not WHY there is Vietnamese flag in the chinese tech tree and I AM NOT COMPLAINING
You could see it mentioned in Italian threads back when they were more or less active, since it’s upgraded by Leonardo.
The type of match I have when I’ve already had many bad matches before and am at my limit.
So far I think the vehicle was placed there because the weapon system was Chinese made. I don’t think there was ever an official statement about where Vietnamese vehicles would go, so until there’s more news it’s really up to guesswork.
Personally I don’t think it’s impossible there would be more Vietnamese vehicles added there, and at least it’s more likely than any other current techtree. I’ve seen Vietnam thrown around as a proposed subtree in the future planned Korean techtree too, but since that’s not in game yet you’d probably be well off playing China now even if Vietnam is added there.
@Smin1080p_WT Is there any chance we can get a developer’s response to when we would see corrected Aster-30 performance? Currently it underperforms in comparison to its real life performance by more than anything else in the game by a significant margin.
Hey
Any updates or responses we get to the individual reports for any of the reported issues will of course be shared as soon as we have something to provide.
There is one special Tunisia map that whatever team brings more ADs or premium Do-335s win the match before fighters reach the battleground
There were plenty of attention and responses when the IRIS-T SLM less than a month after its addition into the game, but even after 9-10 months we can’t get some updates or responses on the Aster-30? I understand there were a lot more community input into the IRIS-T SLM which is understandable that it got some responses/updates, but I don’t understand why we can’t get any update on the Aster-30 nearly a year into its addition.
sky sabre getting the same treatment bro (neither are allowed to outperform the SM-SV)
Then speak up for Sky Sabre too. We all gotta speak up.
Smin why does the SU-39 get 6 ARM when its tech tree variant only gets 2 and dare i mention the 0 on the GR.1?
There was generally quite a lot of reports on the IRIS-T SLM made in a very short period of time, with lots of overlapping issues. Comparatively, the Aster-30 has very few reports even when looking comparatively against other SPAA like the Skysabre. So sadly its not possible to make whole news post responses or coverage in the same way for all vehicles.
But as soon as we have any updates to provide on any open reports, we will indeed do so.
i 100% agree but as much as i like Smin i dont believe there much he can to other than pass information to the devs
Different variants have different loadouts. Su-39 had differing weaponry to other Su-25 models.
okay but doesnt this go against premiums being a “sidegrade” to there tech tree variants and having a lot of ARM below 12.0
There are higher BR variants of the Su-25 family with greater capabilities than the Su-39 in the tree too. Its not simply about the quantity of one missile.
This is fair to say, but those few reports demonstrate that it underperforms in historical performance by a very significant margin. For example the reports show that the Aster-30 demonstrates a 90km kinetic horizontal range in-game when it should have 150km+ kinetic horizontal range, or that the Aster-30 should have 72G performance instead of 50G. The Aster-30’s performance in-game resembles nothing similar to its real-life performance.