Mb there would be some point for me to walk into german rank 5-6 mb then lmao
Leopard 1A2 as a M60A1 equivalent. Many nations have an equivalent, but the problem is it should be at 8.3 despite Eastern bloc 8.3’s field APFSDS.
Which the 1A2 does not have
Edit: I would get the T-54AMZ at 8.0 and move Leopard 1(A0) to 7.7
T95E1 also uses APFSDS. And i don’t consider leo a viable choice in current meta of 35-mm SPAAs and light autocannon stabilized jumpscares. So i guess the easiest choice would be to give the germans the T-55A and call it a day, either at 8.3 or 8.0 considering that iirc NVA never used 3BM25, only 3BM20 which is worse, however, i don’t have any info on how much
Wdym lol it could definitely use apfsds only thing preventing it would be br. The main benefit of 1a2 would just be its stabilizer lol
This doesn’t matter. It’s a balancing decision. The nva never used 100mm Aphe for them but it would likely get it
Then C&Ping T-55 would be a thing, however, i’d look onto 3BM20 in this game as probably the worst APFSDS (even M735 rises above this, most likely) if added
Likely wouldn’t be added the current ammos would just be copy and pasted and also the leopards are fine tanks just the leopard 1 sits at a unfortunately br where alot of stuff is stabilized
Hey @Smin1080p_WT So as of now it is known that the f15’s in game aren’t capable of reaching their top speed of mach 2.5 of which they do in real life and is also listed on their stat cards. So I’m just wondering if this is an issue you guys plan to iron out or if it is intentionally capped at mach 2.33 for balance reasons and is planned to stay that way?
Marketing lie
I mean 30% WR at this range isn’t purely from german mains… Whole their 7.7-8.3 is utter trash except Maus (and E-100), Raketenautomat and Gepard. Leos are mostly suffering either due to lack of stab (1st one at 8.0) and general lack of armor in face of 35-mil spam (leos being like one of the main types of food for such). 1A1 and 1A5 are… just OK, however, they get outclassed either by any kind of actually armored vehicle (like… a T-54/55) or just completely in their role (why would i use 1A5 while having a Chrysler/GM/KPz?), not even talking about SPAAs.
Never trust the statcards, they lie.
2 Likes
I mean they are good tanks. Again the leopards just struggle because most things start getting stabilizers.
im not trusting the stat cards as much as im trusting of what the actual capabilities of the plane in real life is, stated by manufactures, and the military, this plane has been around since the 70’s and its known it can go mach 2.5 lol
This means being outclassed…
Day 1269 of waiting for Polish tech tree
5 Likes
Any plans to fix this?
Why in all br changes nothing is happening in Sim? (For top tier is the CAS that doesn’t allow me to play)
Or maybe remove the PT-76-57 from the ww2 bracket?
And it’s not just ground in air Russia 13.3 has 72% win rate and we all now what plane is there…
Since when soviet+chinese 8_2(_2) started doing ok?
T-54s TO-55, in some lobbie there was a TU-2 killing all of my team
Also the fox being at 6_1 and 8-2, 8_2_2 and the Scimitar being 9_2 is just lazy Gaijin that’s doesn’t even care for Sim
And 8_2_2? Cuz it doesn’t sound too solid for me
I mean yea what’s the best thing they can face? A Clovis/DF105, all rest are M-48s, Centurions and so on
T-54s, M48s and Cents are quite comparable to eachother. I don’t think that 3-4 TO-55 players are just constantly bumping up those percentages.