If I put at least Polish Tech Tree they will know its fake
1 Like
I’ve seen atleast 20 posts today of the same lists, But they keep adding more of their wishlist vehicles and people still believe it…
2 Likes
It’s kinda sad that the average War Thunder player can’t understand how fake all the list that have come out are, I should go check if TEC has made a 40min video analysing my “leek” list
3 Likes
S-smin!! C-can you confirm that this list i made is r-real…?
4 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT
sorry for pinging you again but i’d like to know whether its’ worth using the current “down-time” (until issues are resolved) to report this, or if it is infact a intentional design-choice;
Thats why I have never download tik tok and I don’t think I will ever download that app
3 Likes
Having a similar situation here with another content creator as well
downloading tik tok was both the bigget mistake of my life and one of the better things that I’ve done
Very unlikely unfortunately. Those few TR.9s that were armed typically had 2 x 303s, making it worse than even the Mk I, but having performance between the Mk V and IX.
So its a very hard one to make work.
That, and the Mk IX family is already the most represented in game.
2 Likes
TEC and Matawg. Both of em love spreading misinformation about everything
2 Likes
You can make a report and we can have it checked out sure.
1 Like
Yea I have watched only one TEC video in my entire life (thanks god) and I stop getting my news from Matawg a year ago after he butchered some things
no f16V??
FAKE
By Gaijin standards the Pobit and the V are the same standard (both 14.3) so what’s the point of three same aircrafts?
Still no blegdov
With Matawg, He just takes one tiny piece of information and stretches it out to 10 minutes somehow.
It could be something like the F4E getting shrikes, and he’ll connect that to 5th gens coming to the game lmao
Not trying to sound rude here but ngl, I’m honestly really tired of everyone going “but muh F-16AJ/R2Y2/Ho-Ri” when it comes to vehicles that shouldn’t be added, as they’re really just bad examples and not in the same vein in most cases (like this).
Subtrees are the solution to these things nowadays, and it’s why we haven’t had anything specifically like the AJ since. They’re not going to add a vehicle that doesn’t exist when alternatives are present, which in this specific case with Israel there are alternatives. Israel is apparently fitting/testing two different LDIRCM systems on all of their current Apaches which we could see this year, and the first AH-64Es should be there in less than a year (all according to a friend more familiar than me). Keep in mind having a 13.0 heli isn’t a priority, the Battlehawk is doing just fine right now at its job and Israel isn’t the only one with only a 13.0 (Italy, Germany, and notably Sweden is in the worst state…)
The single chassis bought by and for Japan was never able to make it to them, but it did make it into this world. More than you can say for the Israeli AH-64E as of this moment.
This right here is a different argument, their implementation was based on the vehicles having been trialed by Sweden. Israel has not trialed the AH-64E (didn’t really need to, they had Apaches and knew what they were getting).
Technical compatibility was presumed for such cases, if you can prove that’s not the case then bug report it.
The Chally 3 gotta be real slow and sluggish, since there is still ono dovbleg
1 Like
2 x 303s?!
Gameplay wise, it would be practically impossible to kill anything at all anywhere near the BRs where its flight performance wouldn’t stand out way too much indeed.
This is kinda like the air equivalent to Leopard 2A6HEL with 105mn DM63-armed gun. The very best armor in 12.7, with 9.3-level firepower.
just to pad out the grind:)
tho i would like the block 52+ advanced to foldered with the regular 52+