Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

Damn, so the only error i made was to subtract the thermal to the first tank instead of adding it

I think it would line up with the one posted above, 56

I wonder how you got 36 for the AV?

52-16 = 36

I didn’t notice it was the AV at first (having the thermal compared to the B model)

Yeah but you are upgrading the T-72B with NVDs to the T-72AV. Wouldn’t it be 52+16?

Yeah, i tought the B had thermal :,( (im stupid)

1 Like

Might actually download telegram for this to get whatever price they are referring to.

Genuine next level mental gymnastics in here i love this community

It’s not about numbers, it’s about relevance and gameplay importance. The majority of those “1,000 fixes and issues” are usually things like:


-The coaxial machine gun ammo count has been changed from 1,200 to 1,260.

-BTR-152 — a bug that caused the driver’s model to deform too much when rotating the steering wheel has been fixed.

-CV 9035DK — the machine gun has been changed to the MG3A1.

-FV4004, Conway — The forward speed has been decreased from 37.3 to 37.2 km/h, and the reverse speed has been increased from 12.1 to 12.9.


Matters with far less gameplay importance than the issues we beg every update to be fixed, such as:


-Leopard 2PL’s still missing spall liners (3 years).

-Whole Challenger 2 family still missing spall liners (3 years).

-Type 10’s utterly broken steering (6 years).

-All SEP Abrams still missing their verified 250% CE side armor improvements over M1.

-Abrams still having missing fuel tank bulkhead plates and wrong thickness of them.

-ZTZ-99A’s wrong ammo carousel position (sits way too low).

-ZTZ-99A’s missing spall liners.


There are dozens more of such reports, I only listed the clearest ones where nothing justifies not having been fixed for 3-6 years.

Like, sure, I’m glad that Conaway is now, uh… 0.1 km/h slower than before, but I would rather finally have the Type 10 family be drivable after 6 years since their introduction. Or that all the MBTs missing critical survivability features like spall liners finally get them.

It’s not about “amount of”, it’s about “actual gameplay importance of”.

10 Likes


you did a lil oopsie on the skirts: (unless the last 6 are supposed to be 4x, looks like a 5 to me xd)
grafik

and skipped a tile on T-72B turret somewhere ig

T-72AV (TURMS-T) → 220 ERA Tiles
T-72B → 227 ERA Tiles

I am also like half asleep rn, so I might have also messed up somewhere, idk (esp with my schizo counting method)

Their plan is to make us schizophrenic

I think they succeeded

4 Likes

Granted the (overall) post history since that one person sent the riddle here… yeah

Gotta take a shower first but I will take a look at where I messed up and yes that is a 4 with heavy scoliosis

1 Like

Alright xD
Can’t say my writing would be any better so…

I did double-check my T-72B schizo counting and it seems to be correct at 70 but now I honestly CBA to do turms aswell

So i did the maths.
The answer is ERROR

1 Like

Gib Ratel gang pack, one day :<

okay yeah I missed one era tile on the left turret cheek of the 72B and on the AV I skipped from 31 to 34 for whatever reason. I blame my neighbor

They also think the only CVRT build specifically to withstand IED and shaped charge attack to protect the crews as the main point of the vehicle only uses sound proofing and no spall lining when every single other CVRT does from its generation/those it was based off.

CVRT pack confirmed :pray: