No one said that the F-14D can’t use AIM-7P, what is being alleged is that there’s no proof of F-14D being able to datalink with the AIM-7P, basically the AIM-7P on the F-14D would just be like the current AIM-7M.
You both wrote that it can’t use aim7P
Then let me provide clarity, by the word “utilize” I meant using it to its full capacity, I believe that Master said the same thing too.
Of course, when the issue comes back, it hits the same thread more than once.
would more Vietnamese vehicle be added to the Chinese tech tree in the future or will it going to be changed to another tech tree?
First time I see a player asking for Vietnam for China but even though it wouldn’t be a bad shout but I kinda would like to leave Vietnam for the United Korean tree
2 Likes
as far as im aware, Vietnam isn’t a subtree of anything right now, so I don’t think it can “change”. The only Chinese subtree I know of is Pakistan.
2 Likes
Honestly, for what I’ve heard about Vietnam, they wouldn’t like to be in the Chinese tree anyway.
1 Like
M1 tank shouldn’t even be in the Chinese tech tree they don’t need it(too add on top of what you said)
The Republic of China(Taiwan) uses it. They were the primary China during WW2, so their additions go to the Chinese tree.
It’s dumb to leave their current MBT out of them. IDK, why people think leaving key vehicles for a line-up or other historic vehicles for a nation out of WT is a good thing.
2 Likes
Dude that train has left the station long ago, Everyone calls taiwan taiwan even though they are just the Republic of China. With how gaijin views successor states within war thunder Republic of China and the Communist Chinese state they both are viewed the same China as that is also why you got all versions of the Germanic governments in one tree and why gaijin is planning on a United Korea tree. It’s basic logic at this point on how the game works with historical governments and nations.
It’s not even political it just they don’t need but aye that part is just me
And why don’t you think they need it, I don’t think this fourms need you but hey you’re still here the same as the M1 : )
Well they have they own mbts and im pretty sure they don’t suffer from having vehicles in general and if thats how you fell but to bad im here
Just because the communist have their own doesn’t mean they should bar the Republicans, that like saying Germany doesn’t need the Mig-29 as they got the US F-4.
1 Like
I mean I think Britain should get m1 but I don’t think china needs I think their doing just fine tbh
I really don’t like the X nation, don’t need Y just because the other nation(s) in the same tree got their vehicle of the same role.
Sorry, I want to make a good line-up of X nation, even if the host/others in the tree have their version of an MBT or otherwise.
(stupid, no new message bug, will try something)
3 Likes
Again with the “need” stop saying need when you just don’t like something
Well, good news, the Australians got an M1 just like they were asking for years.
2 Likes
Mainly due to my efforts I think by lobbying the AIM’s for a long time : )