However giving it the wrong stats might make them reinforce their believes.
Had that happen with the Centauro II. Unlocked it at 12.0, had a fun time in it and got it to about 2 K/D, got moved to 12.3 about 1-2 weeks later.
Good for the French. Loads of stabilized vehicle suggestions replied with a Leopard needed a response. AMX-30C2 cannot come faster and throw that copy out of the Leclerc line.
People will use it, there’s people who spade every vehicle on every tree like I do lol
Dmitry, Game Designer: “The Swedish research tree is my favorite in the game because of its wide variety and really interesting and unique vehicles. As with previous Strv 122’s, you’ll be able to count on the 122B+’s strong turret and UFP, and with the addition of more armor it’ll be even stronger. I recommend taking fights as much as you can where you’ll be able to take hits, but also make sure to use the slpprj m/95 APFSDS round that is great for dealing with T-80 tanks especially.”
We have devs that play every nation, including Sweden.
3 Likes
and please tell me what do the devs who play top tier britain think of the challenger 2’s at the moment?
1 Like
Hey smin, this bug report was marked as “response needed” but the response i gave was ignored
Could you please take a look at it?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/xT0WD2rh03m7
Hey. Forwarded.
3 Likes
Am I the only one who sees a bug with the GBU-53? The MILT is bugged; after locking onto a target, the missile seeker can reset to the horizon or lock onto the ground
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/innqISp0uiUH
In an update where most premiums are irreplacable vehicles like Pucara, Orao, Fw-189 and fan requests like F-14D and Jean Bart, do content creators really have a issue with copy paste premiums?
Not even the F-16AM, nobody referred that. Or the fictional AJS-37. If some guys are willing to pay 70 bucks for the exact reskin, why complain about that?
The bandwagon of content creators, ran by whom even blamed naval out of all for “slop”, set my points a few years back. The next update, we might see a Su-15 premium, Tirpitz premium, Arjun premium, Bronco or Super Tucano premiums.
:
:
:
:
:
Thanks to the devs that at least promised a AMX-30C2 (8 years late but nvm) and clarification on devblogs.
could i bother for one final report i made?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/efPDsrd965C7
Thank you very much
@Smin1080p_WT When nuclear thunder comes back as planned, is it a reasonable expectation that we will see another dev blog that lists all the changes made to it in response to community feedback?
Where its possible to provide responses (where there is sufficient items to respond to and cover) we will always aim too. For sure any time it returns, we will highlight whats new.
1 Like
So they played the Leopard and that’s it? Is that why the Gripen E is left as a mess? Why there numerous gaps in the air tree and ground and why actually solid additions are ignored in favor of a 12.0 SPAA that clearly none of the devs have played was added to a lineup that doesn’t exist?
Please spare us lol
Tell me you didn’t see any of the clips I posted lmao
Seriously for having devs that play every tree either they have no quality control or you simply have someone say they like a tree
A developer playing a nation doesn’t mean every gap in the tree or every bug is magically resolved overnight.
The fact a bug or a gap exists is also not indicative of a dev not playing said tree either. Sweden is much newer as a tree to the game than many other nations. It did not have the longevity or updates that many of the others have had. Naturally its going to have less than those nations that came before it in some areas.
We are working to address gaps in all tree, not just Sweden. As well as at the same time, providing variety and choices for existing line-ups.
1 Like
I saw them and even responded to you what to do with them so we can properly pass them:
This topic is not the place to keep posting them. As nothing can be done with them here.
1 Like
So again why was every NOMADS report not acted upon? You expect myself and others to think the vehicle in its current state had a single dev look at it and say yup that’s a good 12.0 addition?
Additionally for representing Norway you guys have done quite a botched job. I simply cannot talk your word given the state of the NOMADS given you guys actually managed to do a worse job with it than the Elde on Launch which I must congratulate the devs is truly impeccable to achieve
Smin did you see my request to review one last bug report on the PBJs radar?
Seriously?
A thermal sight modification and laser rangefinder modification with no way to use them?
A vehicle that can’t turn when stationary that needs to turn to utilize its missiles. Also completely ignoring it’s brochure stating pivot turning.
Again 4x missiles is a death sentence, you ignored adding the SLS missiles.
And the radar literally doesn’t work 90% of the time.
You can not in good faith look at that and tell me anyone tested it
Why is there still a massive gap in Germany when it comes to light tanks because that premium puma did nothing