I’m pretty sure the f14D does have the datalink can you send me the source that says apg71/f14D doesn’t have datalink to use ain7P?
Why weren’t these reasons given in my previous issues either? I wrote every single one the same way, and each one took a ton of effort. The second issue was just tagged ‘not enough info’ — fine. But the third one? Straight up calling it ‘AI-generated’?? Isn’t that just targeting me personally? It’s really off-putting, you know.
you would be correct, i tried to type it out manuaally even and it said i cant edit it after 5 minutes but atleast i know for next time (if there is one)
1 Like
Sometimes they do list multiple reasons, sometimes they don’t. They have a lot of reports to go through and it’s on us to make sure the report is “perfect” so to speak and make their job as easy as possible.
They’re not targeting you at all, and you did just admit to using AI, using AI at all is a no-go. It’s just that bug-reporting is a cold world where there’s too many bug reports for staff to handle and 80% of them are just time-wasters. It’s on us to make sure we don’t waste any second of their time.
My work isn’t considered work anymore? And even if I used AI as a translation tool, I always proofread it myself. The formatting — bold text, italics, the whole layout — I did all of that manually. Do you really think AI can generate that with a single click? I don’t think so.
They don’t have any negative opinion on your reports or your work, developers set out the standards and Gaijin staff must abide by it.
Just get someone who is bilingual and work with them, even though I’ve submitted like ~300+ reports, I still work with a team of people who I go through sources and reports with, it’s a collaborative effort. Using AI at all isn’t great, cause if you don’t even respect the time to make a proper report and use AI instead, why should Gaijin respect the report either so to speak.
Like I said before, I just want the manager to give me a reasonable explanation. I believe the managers seriously reviewed the first two issues, and I fully accepted the reasons for their rejection. But the third one — the reason they gave for rejecting it? I absolutely refuse to accept that.
Hello
The issue is with the sources. University thesis cant be accepted sadly.
Regarding AI reports, we check reports for AI if it appears suspect and flags up.
1 Like
Good morning @Smin1080p_WT
Multiple tech trees now have two multi-vehicle SAMs such as the US, Japan, and Sweden. Is there plans to add a second multi-vehicle SAMs for other nations? I would love to see the MICA VL for France.
Hey. Currently no, as crashing can be abused to bypass it in this case.
2 Likes
Its possible sure. But nothing to currently speak of.
1 Like
hey smin, can i ask what the need was for the NOMAD to be added to sweden when they already have 2 spaa at 12.0? obviously not every vehicle is added off of need for the nation but its still interesting
@Smin1080p_WT can you please confirm if this is AI or not? since we are on the subject. there are also multiple profile pictures that look suspect to AI generation.
its pretty hard to defend your “slipping through the cracks” emily chally 2 skin when stuff like this has been in the game already
In the second and third reports, I have completely confirmed that there is no content from university theses. Why didn’t the manager consider the first two issues to be AI-generated? It’s clear they read through my issues and the submitted materials carefully. So why is the third one—when there were absolutely no issues and I had manually formatted the text layout myself—suddenly labeled as AI-generated?
What is the second multi vehicle SAM for Sweden? As far as I know they only have the NASAMS.
1 Like
they only have the NASAMS yeah but sweden for some reason needs 3 spaa at 12.0
1 Like
I’m pretty sure the f14D does have the datalink can you send me the source that says apg71/f14D doesn’t have datalink to use ain7P?
Sweden 12.0 is the new Britain 10.0-10.3, there’ll be 5 swedish AAs at that BR soon enough.
At least 10.0-10.3 Britain has the benefit that most of the AAs they got there are actually somewhat decent.
1 Like
i to this day do not understand why we need 2 stormers an osa and a strela all at the same br on the tree
1 Like
Ah that’s right they don’t have a second one.