Need more things for the “anti-C&Pers” to blow their tops off.
reverse lend-lease, missing lend-lease, M4A6, Other vechlies people claim are C&P yet are clearly not.
To be fair you guys confirmed AARGM-ER for next patch so surely it is possible to confirm things for next major :))
In the context of BVVs ongoing updates and commentary on Nuclear Thunder, which is in active testing currently. So its not quite the same.
3 Likes
i have only recently found out about it but it’s looking like a nice lineup (no typhoon yet though unfortunately)
Also let’s not forget that the one person for whom the rules don’t apply the same is BVVD. If my dude wants to share something about future additions, he’s got the power to do so.
1 Like
Is there anything new regarding the PL-12 instability investigation?
1 Like
I wonder, with the ER one beeing (confirmed) surely the normal AARGM will come too, right?
Will xbox get summer sale Tomorrow?
Very much so.
Well, there’s other examples where you guys confirmed things way ahead of time, no? So surely it’s not true that you guys can’t confirm things ahead of time. For example the Gripen was confirmed to come several patches before it came.
He did just deny the RMP :)
1 Like
I don’t think Smin is the right person to ask this question. He’s still a middleman, not a decisionmaker.
It’s not up to him whether or not certain new stuff is announced a whole year in advance, or is added last second to an already active dev-server.
That’s for the devs, and for BVVD, to decide.
In spesific cases? Im not really sure what your main point is here?
We are not going to be spesific questions like “will X nation get a squadron jet” or something. Its got no comparison to BVVs recent answers.
I don’t believe it was said at all anywhere here that we have never confirmed anything ahead of time. Simply, I was answering that we are not going to be answering very spesific questions or confirming things ahead this far head of time for the next major when we are only two weaks after the previous one.
Please take a look agian:
Again, what relevance does this have to what was answered here?
The question is, what makes some majors able to get confirmation or questions answered far ahead of time versus this upcoming major?
good for u then but don’t forget the last 50 years of air tech
If you can please link me to a relevant example where two weeks after a major update, we have confirmed something like what was being asked here:
Then I would be happy to explain the context of why that answer was given at that particular time.
However its really not clear what the question even is here, as you are applying random confirmations from different times, contexts and matters entirely (some Q&As, some feedback responses, some BVV responses) to a random question about the next major in the RR topic.
There are many, many different reasons why something may be confirmed ahead of time. Such as BVVs recent commentary on the ongoing development of Nuclear Escalation. That does not draw the same relevance to a random spesific question on the next major in the RR topic.
More than happy to answer spesific questions here, but this feels like some sort of “gotcha” attempt.
may we know what these fixes are or will there be a “its fixed” tomorrow?
Any fixes will be listed in full within the changelog as and when they come.
1 Like
Not at all, just an attempt at understanding the inner-workings of Gaijin’s feedback system.
Let me clarify. Gaijin (not you in particular) answer popular feedback far ahead of the next major, whether it be in the form of Q&As, etc, correct me if I’m wrong. So if he repeats his question, and others join in on asking that question repeatedly to you, would it not be possible that the question ends up getting answered ahead of time?