I was on about china with that comment
Please join me in lobbying for the 2A4M CAN & 2A6M CAN, please. I want my Canadian line-ups. And I got everything but an MBT (and light like one of the many LAVs, but the Aussies are missing an SPAA like the Hawkei NASAMS)
1 Like
I still don’t think they need it tbh but like I said that’s just me
you know the ALARM is so broken when the only things I can find people talking about it is how mid it is and I cant even find a single video of someone using it on the live server, defiantly game breaking
i thought it was going to be in the Chinese tech tree because there is Vietnamese flag in the setting of Chinese tech tree
Hey @Smin1080p_WT, I don’t mean to pester, but is there any chance I could get an answer regarding this question?
I’m curious if the recent changes to the AIM-54A/C/C+ and a variety of AGMs will reflect any possible changes for other modern Fox-3s.
Continuing the discussion from Major Update "Heavy Cavalry" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 4):
can you bring back some challenger buffs, thank you
1 Like
He’s on holiday
China needed the M1A2T, sure not as much as Britain after the Challys got nuked, but they still needed it, but for different reasons.
Their top tier was lowkey struggling and their MBTs are of questionable strength.
1 Like
chinese mbt have the same issue as russian tanks but trading armour and survivability for some reverse speed
and honestly i do think the challengers are better than the VT4 or atleast they were
(and speaking of the aussie abrams someone help this is painful)
2 Likes
But in some BR, the Lineups are terrible! Here, actually, some duplicates could fit in, as mentioned in the blog. Example: Sweden 6.7: AA no good spaa to use except LvKv 42, Heavy tank, not at all, tank destroyer: there is not a single tank destroyer that really fulfills a tank destroyer job, role; light tank: yes, it’s good; medium tank, you need to take the Strv 74. You also need to take the Finish T34 85 and Chariotier just to have a minimum lineup.
Can you tell me why? I am confused as to why only M1A1, M1A2 (Trophy HV), M1A2 SEPv3, and Australia’s M1a2 have new body armor and interior modeling, while all others do not. Only the M1A1 with composite armor skirts can be displayed in X-ray images. Is this a bug waiting to be fixed or something? How long can we wait for other M1 fixes?
Gaijin probably has a late 80s document that says F-14D cannot use AIM-7P’s datalink and expects us to find a more recent document that says it can use. They don’t source the document as well.
Just another way of “This is my ball I decide what we play”.
IOG works btw. Which is the important feature. Nobody uses DLs to SARH.
They should source/link if they don’t want to it’s probably because they ain’t supposed to have it after all the leakers before did say they had access to classified/export restricted documents
Regarding F-14’s Link 16:
2 Likes
I actually quite like the look of the ZTZ99s but I really dont want to play china (combination of hearing their tanks are mid and that their low tier is almost entirely copy paste)
1 Like
I know it’s painful but it’s absolutely worth it though. I’m sitting at a 3 K/D with my US SEPv3 and that is with the M829A3 apparently having bugged damage.
The 99A can be incredibly fun to play due to it’s incredible mobility, they just aren’t as competitive due to all the other factors.
1 Like
Holy stock shell datamine. Massive W for this change!
2 Likes
oh its definitely worth it with how the challengers are
not just stock shell datamine were also getting OFL 120 F2 for the leclercs and DM53 for the 122s
also stock M829A2? should be M829A1 imo but i guess thats cool
1 Like
huh what happened?
1 Like