I wonder by how much will other air to air missiles performance improve in BVR when they get the same treatment as AIM-54s last update.
IIRC they said they’re working on it but (also IIRC) no clear date as to when it’ll be complete. I’m guessing it’ll be done in batches (ie modern stuff first, then trickle down to previous generations).
Edit: this is what I’m referring to:
Now, excuse me while I go and enjoy Escalation 👋
when?
here
Day 1238 of waiting for Polish tech tree
sparrows and the r-27 are next
Yep, the R-27s are very weak and definetly need a buff
so you have no clue what would actually change for the r-27
becasue it would be a nerf to it
Low altitude performance would be affected negatively by quite a lot, I wouldn’t exactly call it a buff.
Its soviet, Gaijin will find a way
If I had to guess, they are saving up camo nets for the ABSOLUTELY ABSOLUTE VERY MOST TOP end-of-the-like tanks, maybe.
In Germany’s case, that would be Leopard 2A8!
Or maybe they only gave camo nets to the SEPv3s out of pity as a compensation for not giving them their actual armor to try to add some appeal to them.
No you dont understand its evil and soviet so it can only be buffed…
Clearly they should add the Norwegian trialed K2 with a camo net to sweden.
Wouldn’t that be KF51 too?
If they add it, maybe!
But then, the American equivalent would be Abrams-X; both being non-service technology demonstrators.
2A8 and SEPv3 have in common being the peak of the real life service vehicles!
The 60% winrates it enjoys are already “pitty compensation” enough lol, the thing is god tier.
Something something flavour of the month
Or maybe it’s just an S+ tier tank and it’s time to admit that your sense of balance and meta is off.
…and let me guess; in a month, when WR is stabilized back to 45-50% once the well known and recorded flavour of the month phenomenon is over, it will be because its players just suck, right?
Don’t get me wrong, the Abrams tanks are fine, but far from “THE ABSOLUTE VERY BESTEST OF THE BESTEST EVER” and, of course, it doesn’t mean that SEPv3’s brutally butchered implementation is any less of a legitimate concern.
Only 60%?
Definetly drop it down to 12.0 alongside the clickbait then :P