Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

Hey @Smin1080p_WT I have a few questions.

  1. Are there any plans to decompress top tier air BRs to 15.0+? Top tier definitely feels very compressed at the moment, especially with the premium Su-30MKs being forced down into 13.3, which also affects 13.0-12.3, and so on and so forth. It would be nice to see some differentiation between certain high tier vehicles as well. For example, the F-15C GE shouldn’t have the same BR as the F-16CM PoBIT, but due to compression they’re the same BR, and neither really deserves to go down.

  2. A recent devblog discussed the improvement of guidance logic and thrust behaviors for the AIM-54 and ARMs. I’m curious if there are any plans to implement either or both of these for modern Fox-3s.

  3. Can we expect an update to the Thales Scorpion HMD symbology anytime soon? Considering a variety of F-16s got it this update, an updated symbology would be very nice.

2 Likes

Apart from 6.3, every BR has a vehicle but instead of insanely uptiered Spitfires, better Spiteful or Seafang can be placed at 6.3/6.7

Hello

  1. This would be something announced in a planned BR changes newspost or with the expansion of top tier via newer aircraft.

  2. As we mentioned within the blog itself:

" we plan to add this mechanic to all other missile systems"

  1. No current ETA. HMDs and MFDs are two examples of things receiving constant updates and improvements. Sadly its not possible to say when on spesific items.

can we expect another round of br changes any time soon?

3 Likes

i thing he has already said that is too soon after the update to have br changes and they still gathering data or something like that

image
Were getting a new nuke plane? and its an f16? hell yea

2 Likes

maybe for NE the su-24 and F111 and the Tornados are outdated , nuclear rafale incoming?

2 Likes

since we got a J-11B ASM fix surely we will get a PL-12 response atleast (cope)

The tech tree still lacks:

  • late P-63s (P-63E/F)
  • late P-38s (P-38K)
  • late P-47s (P-47D-30, P-47M)
  • late F4F (FM-2)
  • early F6F (F6F-3 or F6F-4)
  • FR-1 (should be tech tree, seriously bruh)
  • F8F-2
  • late F4U (F4U-5)
  • late AD/A-1 (A-1J since A-1H is premium)
  • early B-17 (B-17D for example)
  • glass nose A-26 (A-26C-25-DT, A-26C-50-DT)
  • PB4Y-1
  • night fighter variants of various planes (F4U-4N, F8F-2N, F7F-1/2/3/4N…)
  • OV-10 (not a ww2 prop but still really cool to have)
  • P-59 (P-59B, for real where is it)

Do you need more or is that enough?
The US tree has a crap ton of props but that doesn’t mean it has everything it can get

2 Likes

im gonna be honest I doubt they will be that much stronger then the current top dogs, again they have to sacrifice a lot of missiles to maintain stealth and stealthy itself isnt really a thing warthunder.

to be completely honest I think things like the F22 are over hyped, don’t get me wrong I think its a good plane but I dont think it will be as strong as everyone thinks it is.

1 Like

BVVD stated that they would be adding a higher tier nuke plane for 12.7 to match the capabilities of top tier SAMs so you arent using things like F-111s or Tornados vs Pantsir SM-SVs, it is also meant as a nuke plane in nuclear escalation

meh yes and no. the imfamous rafale kill on the F-22 with fuel tanks was slightly held back. overall i so still think that a eurocanard in WT will curbstomp raptors in the dogfight. not to mention that the F-22 will have worse missiles than the eurocanards. 9X will be close to the likes of ASRAAM but an amraam isnt going to cut it vs meteors and such

i agree that the F-35 wont be a dogfighter, tbh its not much of an anything beyond a reduced viability imho, but i am a hater of the lightning 2

not really, 9X and ASRAAM fill different roles, 9X is basically a worse IRIST while the ASRAAM is meant as a long range IR missiles, its meant to be fired at 30+ km away from the target and close the distance fast so even in that situation the F22 is kinda screwed

honestly thats the issue with the US right now there isnt much better they can get in terms of A2A weapons, their new gen of BVR missiles is still in the testing phase so shouldn’t be added as other weapons have also been denied on such grounds, and the 9X is defiantly the worst of the gen5s IIR missiles

1 Like

Also other COIN aircraft too like the AT-6E and Sky Warden which aren’t WW2 but still props that are missing.

And as a hopeful bonus there’s also the L-4H Grasshopper Rosie the Rocketer but that would probably be an event or GE premium.

2 Likes

It’s a bug with that button specifically (feel free to create a bug report for it, i don’t know if there already is one).

The view still exists and can be accessed through the key bind found in “Controls” → “Spectator camera” → “Switch to player’s view” .

The Rafale started on the Raptor’s six no? That’s not just “slightly held back”

1 Like

Yup, the plan was mentioned in BVV_d’s update on the Nuclear thunder mode:

Nothing official mentioned on specifics yet as far as i know.

1 Like

It never had fuel tanks which was visibly confirmed in the video.

yea bro we can tell from the amazing quality the footage is in
image

2 Likes

No, they started side by side although I guess one could argue that’s being “held back” just because the Rafale as a delta could have made a sharper initial turn-in.

1 Like