Done :3
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/r2eBXjvaGHlK
While playing the sepv3 i noticed that the A2 version of the round deals more damage and penetrates more armor than the A3 version. Do you know why?
because gaijins calculations for shells is dog. simple as that
Any news on ESM mechanic to come for aircraft that could have used it without it being tied to ARMs? Currently only aircraft with ARMs can use ESM, which isn’t realistic as ESM can be used on its own.
welp thats depressing when i was told that the ALARM was to strong to be below 12.3 I assumed it would have been actually good instead of one the worst preforming ARMs in the game but im not surprise at this point that gaijin continue to deny it going on other aircraft
“Besides Escalation, we’re also working on new modes that we plan to launch throughout the summer for both aviation and combined battles. This includes various historical events, as well as new modes and mission types. Details will be released when these events are announced. These events won’t be as large-scale as Escalation, but I hope they will also bring new or well-forgotten experiences.”
Now that sound fun !
its hidden iirc, so
Seems like it’s getting late for the passed to the devs post for June. I wonder if it will drop today now.
Great so now I crash by accident and the enemy SPAA still get’s a kill for just existing ???
Yes, and let me tell you I appreciate when helis crash into invisible trees while playing the NOMADS.
@Smin1080p_WT 2 things,
1: with the Pucara now in game, when csn we exspect the Pescador Missile for it?
2:
With the HARMs now being in the game for a while, can you say whether we will get news about their future BR-wise/performance? For example, will the German Tornado ASSTA1 or British Tornado GR.1 also follow the Italian way of going 0.4 higher in BR and receive the AGM-88A (limited ALARM for the GR.1)?
Just going to point out that the -9X / ASRAAM is external on the F-35.
And they are practically never carried on Missions where stealth is required since they increase the RCS in most aspects significantly.
Welcome back, can you tell me why? I am confused as to why only M1A1, M1A2 (Trophy HV), M1A2 SEPv3, and Australia’s M1a2 have new body armor and interior modeling, while all others do not. Only the M1A1 with composite armor skirts can be displayed in X-ray images. Is this a bug waiting to be fixed or something? How long can we wait for other M1 fixes?
Eh it’s been a bit I just remembered part of Norways reason for essentially using up their stockpile of IRIS-T missiles
At least they realised that mounting a sight above a gun – which, when raised, blocks the sight and, when fired, transmits the recoil to it – isn’t the best idea.
But according to this ASRAAM can be carried internally

Where Passed Suggestion
:me waiting:
We waiting 🤞
Polish Tech Tree gets passed
^blud explodes

