yes there should be 3 turn rates one done near max speed a middle speed and a low speed so you can can estimate performances at other speeds in combat
i would like that actually it be amazing but i feel that be asking to much from them
As previously mentioned, we have plans to update and improve the way information regarding vehicles various aspects is displayed in game.
At the moment, its too soon to say the who / what / when, but its always possible in the future that the information displayed could well improve.
15 Likes
So Statcards would actually be trustworthy?
Is that even allowed?
I’d be looking for useful imformation on the new statcards!
Like STR and ITR performance, possibly AoA Information
maybe listing a Speed next to the “Rate of Climb” figure too
For ground vehicles they’re mostly fine but could do with some expansion
like horizontal traverse angles, reverse speed, gear count too and maybe available shell types, like listing APDS, APFSDS, HESH, HE and Smoke for something like the Strv 103C
If they go for a complete rework (as in a new menu you open, or hover over to view) Graph’s might be extremely nice too, kinda like the new shell comparison feature.
Like Speed vs Turn rate, Max speed for aircraft, and Gear ratios (and in the future) maybe Torque Curves when they are modelled properly,
One can dream but I hope its a hefty rework to provide more useful information to the user
14 Likes
Could we perhaps look forward to any new Skyhawks this coming patch, or am I huffing too much hopium/copium mixture?
look I really would love if we got more planes in this BR range but that’s unfortunately quite unlikely
2 Likes
Surprise surprise today or cope and despair?
cope amd despair
good day to play rare or long not played Airframes and drive tanks you forgot you likes
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT
Netma has revealed amk kit business and if this is added will a separate plane be added or as a part?
Don’t you think that it’s a lil bit too early for that? Lmao
I mean, we are talking about a future modification that’s part of an upgrade programme that hasn’t even really begun
Definitely as a separate vehicle. More than likely coming with the rest of the P4E upgrades.
so either we’ll have only ASRAAM/IRIS-T on the AESA typhoon as soon as the next tech leap in Missiles comes or only METEOR and the rest will come with the next EFT or that EFT with AMK and more P4E mods won’t come at all
They’ll probably add another fantasy spec variant lol
if they do add another one at all that is
I can absolutely see them keeping this as the top plane for the next 5 years with the addition of F-35s as only next option
just remember how long we had the Phantom FGR.2 as only top plane in Britain or how long the Italians were stuck with the G.91Y
additional evidence: has any F-16 nation gotten 3 levels of F-16? has any nation gotten more than 2 Phantoms? have there been more than 2 MiG-29s in any nation?
3 Likes
I do get what you mean, but the F-16s and F-4s aren’t good examples lol
F-4C, E, J/S and F-16A, A ADF and C in the US tree
F-4F early, F-4F and KWS in the German tree
F-4J(UK), K and M in the British tree (they realistically should differ more, but Gaijin doesn’t want to change the Ms loadout)
Netz, Barak and Sufa in the Israel tree
imo they were perfect examples
F-16A and ADF are or rather were the same generation, no power diffrence when they were added
the rest is exactly like the EFTs 2 in different power generations (although the AESA doesn’t have what I believe will be it’s signature weapons)
F-16A OCU, F-16A, and F-16AM for Belgium in the French tree also
France also has two Rafales that are identical apart from the naval one being heavier
1 Like
remove the premium one and the thing turns out true again
2 different F-16s with different Power gens
with the Rafale’s I too believe there that one will get better missiles than the other one soon
They don’t have a premium one, it’s a SQV