I just assumed it would be your standard 90mm HEAT slinger considering it was on a light chassis
ah, then a better fit is needed, without searching my brain comes up with nothing, closest i could say would be a land rover with a recoilless, but thats different
oh I never meant to say the Oli’s didn’t fit in the tree, i was just saying that there are british built alternatives / equivalents
and the Hunter F.6 is dubious at best, better since SRAAMs were buffed though, its a 8.7/9.0 airframe at 9.7 because of a gimmick missile. I don’t know about others, but if the SRAAM was just deleted in game from the F.6 and GR.1, I would be a lot happier person, so really its a 8.7-12.0 gap,
without subtrees that area with a proper fighter would be difficult to close, but maybe P.1154 (Supersonic Harrier with Red Tops) could fit
otherwise an Aussie Mirage / Cheetah would be fit fine
Yea the CDK is pretty much unusable. Only a handful of maps work but they are missing lots of textures, every time you add a unit there’s an error message and god forbid you try to add anything like a base or airfield since the CDK just instantly crashes. Can’t even show the units without a 10 minute freeze and crash. Hell you lucky if the CDK even starts in the first place without crashing.
I’m almost certain that the Leopard 2A4 premium in the French tech tree doesn’t sell well, because people don’t play France to use Leopards. It’s a very, very bad option.
There are Mirage 2000 prototypes with AESA radar, Mirage F1 variants equipped with MICA missiles, and more advanced Mirage 2000 versions like the -9 — so why on earth add premium equipment that already exists in other tech trees instead of focusing on what actually makes the French tree unique? It makes no sense.
@Smin1080p_WT Any update on the horrendous Google Translate voice lines getting fixed?
Or at least being able to turn off those? Because it’s excruciating having to listen to Russian expressions and shell names translated word for word into Hungarian.
Having to hear Taylor getting loaded(poor guy), high-power explosive-loaded, and smoke grenade getting loaded, is painful.
@Smin1080p_WT
Tini tiny question, the A-7E for the US goes down in br, but the Thai one is not (according to the sheets) is this going to be fixed soon, since it’s the same aircraft.
It doesnt need to go down at all, instead of getting AIM-9Ls and AGM-65F the BR reduction for it is just a pointless fix.
If anything it’s just more compression but it wont change much for it as its a bloody attacker and attackers dont have a place in air RB, especially modern subsonic ones
Plus, let’s not talk about how innacurate the weapons on the Thai A-7 actually are…
A good option would be the proposal for Morocco by Dassault of the Mirage F1 with 2 MICA, 2 magic 2s and an HMD. I could see it as a 13.3 premium, considering the very limited but extremely potent missiles.
It’d be quite a unique aircraft as well
It doesn’t get AIM-9L’s and AGM-65F’s?
The Thai A-7E is the exact same as the American one. The American one goes down in br and the Thai one does not - it makes no sence.
The US A-7E was and is, a mega powercrept machine. they could’ve given it the rest of its historical ordnance and leave it where it’s at.
The Thai one never carried Navy Sidewinders, it could, however, carry AIM-9P-4s. It also didnt have any guided ordnance as Thailand didnt procure any.
All im saying is that if they fix the ordnance on the two, the US one remains at 10.7 and the Thai one can drop down due to worse ordnance.