SHar was quite a late addition. early 2000s.
But the Gr7/Gr9 and Tonkas might have used the different chaff, but that would be a Gunjob question
are you sure? i swear the shar was one of the earliest adopters of the rail
mightve just been basic harrier and im being silly
It’d be the same chaff found in the Tornado GR.1s BOZ pod but probably not quite as many lol
No, im fairly certain FA2 was an end of life upgrade, part of the reason why it likely was never fitted with the twin rails + BOL .
But Tornado F3 and Gr1 got them for Op Granby in 1991 and I wanna say GR7/Gr9 had pure chaff quite early on in life
pure chaff on the Bol prior to 2000s is just a fact, there was no IR countermeasure made before Chemring and saab bashed their heads together on it later on
its just, what chaff was used?
Yeah, that I have no idea about
funny enough this may be a bug in general I had my Ajax’s belt explode but instead of killing me it just destroyed the ammo in the auto loader and destroyed the auto loader while playing the blow out panel effect
my main source for all this
ive realised it may have just been prototyped with the big chaff and not actually used with it
To add onto that this one was ONLY for the LAU 7 rail
BOL 500 was for every other rail and that is 90s
1 Like
sorry Im not sure where you check where bug reports are posted but is there any chance the Ajax sights are bugged? they only have a 6x and nothing else which feels very odd, I heard someone mention it should be 2x-10x
Here: Community Bug Reporting System
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/zFbdvzvA5o8X
1 Like
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/JLq0ot8UtCF8
or
Community Bug Reporting System but Gaijin is being dumb on this one like normal
1 Like
They marked it as a bug…
They could atleast have devs look at it as there is some truth in the bug report
1 Like
I decided to play 10.3/10.7 on a whim and imma be real either i am playing a different game or some of y’all are just straight up overreacting lmao.
Depends on teams and vehicle, in a mbt im fine any IFV is worthless though imo
I just had one struggle to kill me in a leopard 2K and to make it even worse an XM-1(C) of all things killed me before he could. i then respawned and took out his turret in a PUMA… In any case i am going to go back to spamming 9.0 lineups because 10.3 has many other issues that aren’t the BMPT that make me not want to play it much longer.
1 Like
saw this on Reddit … claims to be not a leak but rather a what-if: " Hypothetically speaking, if this was the upcoming Spring Update how much would you like it or not? "
4 Likes
Tbf the average Russian braincell is on overdrive struggling to learn how to even move while playing the BMPT gotta give em some credit
The Bug Reporting managers are… questionable, ive seen many bug reports fit all requirements just be listed as Not A Bug over and over
1 Like
Considering the majority of the people who have to deal with the Russian 10.3 lineup mostly all agree the BMPT is bs at 10.3 that should say something.
I mean the Namer isnt better and its at 11.3
1 Like
I say fake given it’s this early
1 Like
Obviously fake as it’s not 50% premiums but personally I would quite like it.
The EAV-8B+ would be a very welcome addition. Could make for a decent grinder over the F-104S and AMX A-1A.
But if we was the see the F-16V it wouldn’t go to the US. Most likely we would see it go to China through Taiwan and Israel through Greece. The US would most likely get the F-16C PoBIT which would be functionally identical to the F-16V Block 70/72 except for not having CFT’s.
2 Likes