Yeah i’d say both are doing exceptionally well lol. I’m curious about what’s gonna happen with it.
Any chance to see some decomp for 14.3?
1 Like
The monitoring is done by the accountant right? Bet it must be making massive revenue with the BMPT
14 Likes
Why is it the snail constantly wait when they cause problems? You know these vehicles need to go up but its decided to make air a cesspool for a month or more
Based upon a recently accepted report to buff the BMPT. Im praying that by “monitor” you mean nerfs or BR increases and not buffs.
Buff the BR by .3 but give it APFSDS you mean
Where were the sources for this report? “Change this to be overpowered like the TT one, I am dying too much, I need to seal club in my premium BMPT” - Gets accepted. There are no external belts in the BMP-T, the ammo leads straight down to the autoloader and the crew.
The only thing they are monitoring is the sales revenue.
7 Likes
Also the report below that will make it even harder to kill.
This isn’t a historical report. But a gameplay issue report. It was linked to an already pre-existing internal report that was logged before this was even made.
1 Like
I hope the people monitoring do not make up as much nonsense as the people handling reports.
External…
And of course, even primary sources proving that the “external” belts do not even exist are simply closed with “not a bug” and no further comment.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/zcuuSretIbBc
Because of course the classic;
Give a non-sense excuse first and then stop giving reasons once proven wrong.
11 Likes
Bug Reports are not accepted or rejected based on BRs. BRs can be changed if a vehicle increases in efficiency. But a report would not be rejected about a game bug or a historical report / suggestion unless it is for something already answered, itended or not yet in game.
1 Like
But reports are actioned based upon balance though. Onyl reason why I can think BOL bug reports have been ignored for the past 2 years for example and was changed based upon in-accurate information.
Though there are many other examples I could name.
1 Like
Please in a previous bug report for the ammo not causing destruction of the vehicle was rejected with the claim that it is external ammunition could you give some clarification here?
If you are referring to jets, the first week(s) of an update have a very skewed picture. Some vehicles can be overly spammed because they are new or interesting or long awaited. The data set from this period is typically not enough to show the individual performance reliably across a whole BR range to show exactly where wide sweeping changes would best be suited. So for this, a larger data sample is ideally collected before entire brackets may change. Hence why its best to keep this separate from the launch of a major update.
Outside of whole BR bracket changes, Individual vehicles may still have their BRs reviewed and adjusted if the evidence and data clearly points to a significant discrepancy.
This is not the case. The information is currently inconclusive for the devs to make a change. It has not been withheld for balancing reasons.
You are also confusing what I said. I was talking about reports being accepted in the first place on the CBR. Not implemented:
Regardless the snail always seems to think a .3 difference is good enough, i think almost everyone agrees air needs a BR or 2 more added to it because the capabilities of some vehicles are far outmatched by their competitors MIG29G vs SU-27/33 F-18C vs every other 14.0 jet ect
We need actual decomp and not just bandaid solutions
1 Like
what about F-15C MSIP II, F-15A, and F-15E getting BOL? its known they can have it, there are accepted reports on it iirc
1 Like
So 100% fake information can be used to nerf stuff, but to buff it back to IRL performance you need a dozen primary sources.
Gotta love that
5 Likes
Nothing to currently report on that. Any accepted reports would be updated if it were the case, as this would not be done generally outside of major updates.