Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

Yeah, definetly a possibility. Though no idea what or even if any MBTs have the necessary ECM to jam MMW

Why would they fix what’s not broken in their opinion?

Unfortunately this is the case. Until such time there is an Su-30 with BOL at least, then it will be top priority

1 Like

Inb4 Su-47 with 4000 BOL CM’s and suddenly they announce a BOL rework.

2 Likes

Hear me out: They could replace the current multipathing implemenation with “ground bounce” ECM which is effectively the same.

1 Like

Probably would deal with the current… buggyness that can occur with MP

In a similar vain we should ask for a premium Harrier to go to Russia so that they fix it’s proper FM, engine temp issues, the actual Sea Harrier HUD + EEGS, a correct GR.1 cockpit etc etc.

2 Likes

Well, why do you think they haven’t implemented the “Tor M2DT” yet? Because they would have to collateral fix the swedish SLS SPAA :D

Day 1056 of waiting for Polish tech tree

2 Likes

Gaijin would rather let the sun implode then fix the Elde. I can almost tell you the elde will rot and they will make the Tor M2DT the best off road vehicle for sure

4 Likes

Welp, I’ve spent the whole day on ER and may have to stay for a while, apparently my heart is damaged and failing, among other issues I had been dragging for some time

Perhaps I may actually not get to see regenerative steering, or… all of those fixes I always wanted to see after all hahah

All along… I said it as a joke yesterday, but who knows now. Hopefully it will turn out to be nothing too bad but guess I had to blow off some steam.

Anyway, I will try to stay up to date and stay online. I’ve got my phone with me so it’s something I guess

23 Likes

sheesh, stay safe man, good luck, you got this

1 Like

The one before the MiG was a Russian ship?

1 Like

Yes, the AK-225

1 Like

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

good lord

could it be possible the fix isn’t deployed yet?

Godspeed and good luck.

2 Likes

@Smin1080p_WT


image
imageimage

Hey Smin, what do you think about this component layout?

There are AGM-114 and AGM-114 2 listed as separate modifications, and even though they are essentially the same weapon, using the quad launcher requires researching AGM-114 2 separately. This creates a rather convoluted situation where players have to research an additional modification purely to increase weapon loadout.

As a point of comparison, aircraft such as the JAS 39E Gripen or the F-15C Golden Eagle do not require separate modifications solely to increase weapon quantity when using the same type of armament. Based on these precedents, what is your opinion on removing the AGM-114 2 modification from the Italian A129 CBT?

Additionally, do you think it is reasonable to expect this modification to be removed in a future update?

4 Likes

don’t give em Ideas for adding more AMRAAM mods

2 Likes