Eh i like the old design more
There IS something to post about, that being the list of suggestions that have been passed to the devs
That includes the Su-47
I feel like “no plans to speak of” isn’t really an answer, but I guess that’s just me
2 Likes
this is far far from final
this is an early early proto
WAR and PSO combined are just a double dead weight. WAR maybe would be useful if it wasn’t 5.5 tons of “heavy air” and protected against KE at least not worse than Kontankt-1.
Yes, it’s obvious that “we don’t plan” is a rephrased answer to “As long as there’s no news about it, we don’t plan anything.” I’m sure of this.
It’s silly to expect a clear answer from smin, as it’s clear that no one will directly state whether something will happen or not. All technology should remain a surprise.
2 Likes
It’s an answer while being a complete non-answer. Never once has it been clearly said that they currently have ‘no plans full stop’ for the vehicle, just that they have ‘no plans to speak of’. Which very, very, very clearly implies that there are currently plans for the vehicle, but they aren’t considered ready to talk about yet. Probably because of the obvious display of double standards that it entails.
3 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT while you’re here: Are there ANY BR changes in the works? Possibly even decompression? Maybe with CONSULTING the community?
Or are the queue times still too long?
2 Likes
Are you aware if its planned for this year or should we exspect it by 2030?
Thats a very, very, very strange takeaway from that. But sure. If you want too believe that. I cant stop you, only provide the facts for those that want it.
The aim was to stop this needless back and forth that’s been going on all day and people getting wound up unnecessarily.
Sadly even when answers are provided, something people are always asking for more of, its taken like this.
We will have our regular BR reviews yes. But nothing to announce regarding timeframe at this exact moment.
1 Like
Hopefully there is one sooner rather than later… There are some MAJOR issues that need to be resolved, and needed to be resolved yesterday
3 Likes
Cough…….BMPT
2 Likes
If thats the case then it should be no problem at all to say:
Currently, there are no plans for the SU-47 full stop.
Could you kindly confirm this without using the phrases ‘plans to speak of’, or ‘plans to discuss’ or ‘plans to talk about’
Then I will shut up and go away, pinky promise
Smin, can say when the Devs are back and its back to normal (minor update wise)?
No clue which vehicle you are reffering too xD
Aight, I’ll just pretend that the Su-47 suggestion never got approved to be posted on the forum to begin with
Anyways, since this beauty got passed to the devs
Do y’all think they’ll ever let us use depth charges as makeshift bombs and add them to the planes and helis that did carry them IRL?
3 Likes
It’s the Boxer, obvs
I thought the Puma :P
The Puma, its under BRed, should be 11.0 as Spikes are a minor upgrade :P
There is a problem there however. Anything in the game is subject to change at some stage. At one stage, we hard denied supersonic jets would ever be a thing. The same with air-to-air missiles and many other things. Things can change, there is always a potential chance of that. Its been used against myself and many others many, many times even though we are simply providing the official answers and plans as they are at the time. So we don’t see a need or reason to do that anymore.
You will also notice I said its same about the EAP:
But you didnt seem to rush to say “omg EAP clearly planned”.
Quite frankly we are not going to hard deny vehicles anymore. If we have no current plans to speak of, like this, then we will say that when we can so people don’t get false expectations.
1 Like
Thats what I mean, I just had an Match were the Spikes worked (vs Planes/Helis)