No, I’m not. You are saying there was no intent to arm EAP, only a hypothetical future plane. This is incorrect. Provisions were made to arm the EAP airframe itself, as it was built and existed.
1 Like
I am saying that there was intent to arm a future EAP, you are saying the same thing.
for clarification, Official subtree,
or
not anything danish planned to break the Denmark → Sweden trend
2 Likes
I think someone feels kinda silly now lol
2 Likes
IDK why they think I’m not talking about a future EAP when I obviously am.
Please explain how that is different from an intent to arm a future SU-47 then. The existing airframe was never armed, it was only (allegedly) planned for a hypothetical future that never materialised.
1 Like
I’m not talking about you but another person : 3
Why would I justify an argument I never made?
Go speak to someone that is making that argument.
Yeah i don’t think we are gonna get an answer to that
Why would I justify an argument I never made?
Go speak to someone that is making that argument.
The issue is there are no documents with intent to arm EAP, only documents to arm a later “EAP” military intended aircraft, similar to F-20A and AIM-120s.
Su-47 has the government contract order.
You imply that there is a difference in the intent to arm some hypothetical EAP and the alleged government contract for the SU-47 right here which warrants the SU-47 being a valid addition and the EAP not being one.
I made no such implication.
All I stated was Su-47 was a government program and it should be compared to other government programs.
I’m not going to get any Su-47, and I didn’t vote on the suggestion to begin with.
1 Like
Guys, neither the Su-47 or EAP have anything to do with this topic. Please take it to a more appropriate place or PM if you want to carry this on. Its been going back and forth all day.
2 Likes
Is Denmark an official subtree?
Will we see GBUs re-added in the future? Currently missing having them on the Jag
Small steps, but it’s good to see that it is slowly being done.
I don’t even care about those radars being extremely niche, as long as they do their job properly.
Off the top of my head the PV-2D, the Shackleton, the naval Lancaster and the M.B.175T still lack any kind of radar functionality ingame.
I guess that’s true, I just wish the rangefinding radars would do something useful and not just serve as a way to annoy others by triggering their RWRs
Something that is kind of related that would be neat to see are radar guided turrets, like the one on the B-66 or the AGLTs on certain British bombers.
Sub tree as in currently a few vehicles sure if you want to classify it as such.
GBUs haven’t been removed from any Jaguar?
Is there a chance their vehicles will go anywhere else, the Germans have been asking for us too despite that making no sense
Anything to do with what topic? This thread topic is for rumours regarding the next major update, where the SU-47 is leaked rumoured to be coming.
They dont work, havent in 5 months.
Most GBUs havent worked in 5 months. Was wondering they were ever going to be fixed because at this rate, they might as well just be deleted from the game