Afaik it was supposed to have a radar mounted, but it was canceled before that happened.
Nothing has changed regarding the EAP unless there is some new information thats come to light recently.
1 Like
Fine, so why is than the Su-47 Berkut in the Passed to the devs?
There were provisions and plans for weaponary. Much like the Yak 141, so it meets the suggestion criteria. The EAP does not and has been answered already numerous times.
5 Likes
Hmm, so Alpha Jet ICE could also be Suggested?
Pretty much same case as Berkut than
3 Likes
I dont know the spesifics of this vehicle. Please check the suggestion critera. If it flew and mets the rest of the requirements, then likely it can be.
1 Like
The provisions being a weapon bay that could open and close? It didn’t even have a radar or plans for one. There’s also no information on what weapons it could have and even then it never flew with them.
7 Likes
So where would you put the Su 47.
Yak 141 or EAP?
T57, T77, T69 would be grand additions. Better be as TT additions as well, 2 is enough for premium.
2 Likes
This is just a player made suggestion. Like all of them, it doesn’t mean the vehicle would come to the game.
Currently we have no plans to speak of for this vehicle.
1 Like
Oh I would too, but I wouldn’t be happy. It’s funny that you talk about more WoT additions, so long as they are real. I’ve been playing WoT again and saw they had the M1 Thumper in game (granted they call it the CATTB Thumper which gives me an aneurysm) and was wondering why we don’t have it? Same with the M113 with a recoilless rifle, T92 HMC, the T249 Vigilante (WoT doesn’t even have air planes, how they have the Vigilante implemented is beyond me).
Were this provisions proof the same proof of dual racks on the Su-30SM
2 Likes
All of the information on the vehicle is in the suggestion topic. It has nothing to with this topic, as its just a player made suggestion.
So we can get back on track here please.
3 Likes
How about something like the F-15SE? Would that meet the requirements to be added or would it need to be it’s tech demonstrator the F-15E1?
7 Likes
Respecfully im not going to go vehicle by vehicle as people tag one after the other here. Off the top of my head I cannot approve or recall every vehicle and this will just start a cascade of off topic here.
We have public guidelines avalable for suggestions. Please check them to see if the vehicle you want to suggest meets them: Rules, Guidelines & Tips For Creating Suggestions (Check Before Creating A New Suggestion!) - #8 by leroyonly
This will be reviewed by the suggestions team and escalated to the senior team as required if there is an issue.
1 Like
hey smin, i know you maybe already said it but when can we expect the new br / fix for ground tree, i dont mean by only bmpt but in general for all nation like 12.7 to 13.0
Good Afternoon @Smin1080p_WT
Is there anything in the works for a minor nation (or overall) MBT damage model overhaul this year, it seems like a large undertaking but one that’s been promised for a decent while now?
Yeah guys get back on track.
In the Q&A from December of 2024, they said 2025 would be prioritizing filling gaps in current nations in the form of sub trees and new types of vehicles. Currently, the US does not have a wheeled IFV or missile carrier in the tech tree. This is rather insulting as the US has tons of domestic options to fill these roles, yet they are ignored. So maybe this year, we will actually see these types of gaps filled instead of just being told they will be filled?
This was done throughout 2025 and will continue to be done. Unfortunately its always going to be possible to find a specific niche gap, but we are working to fill them as far as possible.
The US tree as a whole was one that generally needed things a lot less than others. Its pretty clear contextually that answer was not regarding the US tree.
1 Like