Guess theres WoT which could add it lmao
1 Like
More Chi-Ha LG? I know there was a Chi-Ha with a short 20cm gun, but I haven’t heard of any others.
3 Likes
You already know the answer, as you have asked before.
If there is a report up, then it depends on the conclusion of that report.
Hey ill take any excuse for gaijin to add more even a ghillie version as a prem would have me shoving money into the snail
2 Likes
The report has been accepted for months the report went through right after the changes were wrongly made. Why does it take months to looks at
Maybe it was a clear marketing lie which is why its taken so long
6 Likes
Not the first time a change has been made using incorrect information and the report to fix what was changed with actually correct information taking years to even be looked at
1 Like
Because there is conflicting information from multiple primary sources. So changes are not going to be made again unless it can be confidently confirmed this time.
1 Like
There literally are none unless you dont have eyes we have brochures that show the 2002 model and show its stats and they fit with the original stats while the 2006 model fits with a completely different model how did the devs screw this up so badly unless they simply wanted to nerf it.
@AspectOfTheRAGE you did the majority of reports and the info provided is pretty clear do you have any idea how someone could misinterpret them without idk using their eyes to read?
2 Likes
There seem to be so many MiG-25 players around, yet I never get downtiers when using the F.3 :(
As for 11.0/11.3 planes to use against MiG-25s, the F-4E (or EJ in my case) definitely works well against them. However, when one gets away, the pain begins.
There is no point in chasing them, as they will outrun you no matter what plane you are flying. You really have to engage them frontally unless they are at very low altitudes.
I feel like Gaijin made a big mistake when they nerfed the ticket drain caused by base and AI target destruction and the MiG-25 situation is a great example to highlight the issue that these nerfs created.
Outside of that issue, the MiG-25 seems pretty balanced (I feel like it could go up to 11.3 though)
Gaijin really gotta figure that ticket drain issue out though
I start to believe in bias when I meet Sovetsky Soyuz in my RN Roma, especially looking at the difference in RoF and accuracy.
1 Like
There are plenty.
For example, if we take the lowest weight of this source (which states from 26-40), then the crew also need to be reduced from 4 to 3.
Other primary sources are also showing the 35T value:
Spoiler
So until more conclusive information can be found, changes wont be made.
Janes has also been rejected as a source and wont be used.
Literally 2006 showing the weight omg who wouldve thought but we have the weight for models like the 2002
Which gives us a starting weight of 26T up to 40 which matches 2ith the heavier modified CV90120’s so again the 2002 model starts around 26t which we have sources for
Both the Khanjali and the PZL-230F Skorpion would be cool to get in WT, but sadly Poland didn’t consider WT when they cancelled those projects
2 Likes
I assume there isnt “what it wouldve been” specs either?
No Yak-141 treament for my dream tank would be sadge
Just identify as a Russian vehicle, and Gaijin will reconsider
Until this can be conclusively proven, changes will not be made. As the vehicle matches existing primary sources currently.
Hell theres even this source which shows the 2006 model and says its 35T but guess what we dont have the 2006 model in game
1 Like
Why change it in the first place if the devs weren’t sure outside of clearly just not wanting to admit they have no idea what they are doing?
2 Likes
All of these sources are within the report, there is no need to spam the topic. I have provided you the current answer. The report is not going to change without new information.
The vehicle matches existing primary sources.
Sadly neither did the RAF when they canned this idea
Vulcan with 12 Phoenix missiles
5 Likes