It’s gonna happen someday, Austria has Tranche 1 Typhoons, Saudi Arabia has Tranche 2 Typhoons and Spain has both Tranche 1 and 2 Typhoons
Those already could be used as premiums
It has already been forwarded. Accepted = forwarded to the devs
If the same thing happens with the Rafel (which it looks like it will) we are going to playing dorito thunder soon
Ah, oké.
Do you know when they are going to take action and actually implement the changes?
imo it would only be fair if they added some really early one, like a Rafale M LF.1 (no irst, no hmd, pesa…).
The regular M F.1 should be tech tree
They could do an early Rafale premium as well once the BR ceiling gets increased
I wait gaijin annouce battle rating change in this week or next week
might take more time than that lol
I wait for decompression of the whole br range
Except props, they’re mostly fine
They will, since we get Rank IX soon.
I could maje my guesses but currently waiting for TS C to do it’s thing
@Smin1080p_WT
Apologies for the ping
However, I am curious about something
In the last Q&A, it was said EC style maps in Air RB didn’t gain much popularity among players, which brings me to my question (if you are able to answer).
Are there currently plans to remove said maps from rotation (considering they aren’t that popular)?
The early aircraft pre-order premium pack rank 9 for UK & Italy tech tree ?
Or might be the first aircraft pre-order pack rank 8 for france tech tree ?
I feel like for actual top tier the size of the EC maps is pretty beneficial, but for the lower tiers they should definitely be removed from the pool.
It’s so incredibly annoying that Gaijin refuses to add a seperate ARB EC Mode…
Currently there is insufficient information for any changes to be made.
If they become overly disliked to the point where there are lots of people asking for that, then it may be considered. However BVV was simply pointing out they are not the most popular and it hasn’t gained popularity as a result.
Sorry for the ping.
During these 2 years other pictures had beeen provided to show that at least the hull armor is incorrect.
One of them is the direct comparison between the in game model and a top down photo from CIO of the Ariete.
The red marks shows different weld lines that hint to a quite different armor layout compared to the model in game ( bigger plates and possibly the composite screen in the middle gap ).
We can’t provide data as it would be illegal, but why is this still not considered as “enough info”? ( at least for the hull )
F-14D next up date please 🙏 be in the leaks🤞
What if it ends up in the leaks, but doesn’t get added lol
Why doesn’t gaijin want to add a separate Air Realistic Enduring confrontation mode in the Event tab like Simulator battles ?
Is it be because it wasn’t popular or was it due to unbalances, casue if they want to add modes like SEAD and air superiority to game, they should be a in separate mode from ARB.

