Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

Oh I would too, but I wouldn’t be happy. It’s funny that you talk about more WoT additions, so long as they are real. I’ve been playing WoT again and saw they had the M1 Thumper in game (granted they call it the CATTB Thumper which gives me an aneurysm) and was wondering why we don’t have it? Same with the M113 with a recoilless rifle, T92 HMC, the T249 Vigilante (WoT doesn’t even have air planes, how they have the Vigilante implemented is beyond me).

Were this provisions proof the same proof of dual racks on the Su-30SM

2 Likes

All of the information on the vehicle is in the suggestion topic. It has nothing to with this topic, as its just a player made suggestion.

So we can get back on track here please.

3 Likes

How about something like the F-15SE? Would that meet the requirements to be added or would it need to be it’s tech demonstrator the F-15E1?

image

7 Likes

Respecfully im not going to go vehicle by vehicle as people tag one after the other here. Off the top of my head I cannot approve or recall every vehicle and this will just start a cascade of off topic here.

We have public guidelines avalable for suggestions. Please check them to see if the vehicle you want to suggest meets them: Rules, Guidelines & Tips For Creating Suggestions (Check Before Creating A New Suggestion!) - #8 by leroyonly

This will be reviewed by the suggestions team and escalated to the senior team as required if there is an issue.

1 Like

hey smin, i know you maybe already said it but when can we expect the new br / fix for ground tree, i dont mean by only bmpt but in general for all nation like 12.7 to 13.0

Good Afternoon @Smin1080p_WT

Is there anything in the works for a minor nation (or overall) MBT damage model overhaul this year, it seems like a large undertaking but one that’s been promised for a decent while now?

Yeah guys get back on track.

In the Q&A from December of 2024, they said 2025 would be prioritizing filling gaps in current nations in the form of sub trees and new types of vehicles. Currently, the US does not have a wheeled IFV or missile carrier in the tech tree. This is rather insulting as the US has tons of domestic options to fill these roles, yet they are ignored. So maybe this year, we will actually see these types of gaps filled instead of just being told they will be filled?

This was done throughout 2025 and will continue to be done. Unfortunately its always going to be possible to find a specific niche gap, but we are working to fill them as far as possible.

The US tree as a whole was one that generally needed things a lot less than others. Its pretty clear contextually that answer was not regarding the US tree.

1 Like

Hi smin, the CV90120 was told that the weight is correct despite the primary source + two secondary sources disagreeing
Whats up with that?

(This is new today as it was “not a bug” 14 hours ago)

Hey. This was already answered yesterday and in the report itself. There is conflicting information, so the weight will remain as it currently is as it matches a primary source.

One of the primary sources thay claimed a lower weight would also lead to a crew reduction from 4 to 3. So we dont plan this.

1 Like

Is that why Russia got its 4th, 5th, and 6th IFV (in the TT, 1 of them wheeled) in 2025 while the US hasn’t gotten one in almost 5 years? You’re telling me despite not having a wheeled IFV or missile carrier in the TT at all, they aren’t seen as needing them?

I did not notice that in fairness but the weight was upped under the assumption that the CV90120 was present in game as its maximum weight load possible when we know thats not possible as per my report

Tho with the extra crew member i can see it being up to maybe 30ts as is without the added composite needed to make it 35t

It was perfectly clear, yes. I used your message to swing into another conversation showing that a nation with plenty of options, is lacking even one of them.

Call to arms

Sorry, but i refuse to believe that the US “needed a lot less”

Another possible ground support vehicle that is very much needed by Japan.

part three in the future

1 Like

if its not russian, slim chance for it to come

There are as much “provisions and plan for weaponry” as every technology demonstrator yeah…

6 Likes