I’m still not aware of any western R-27 analogue
asraam, iris-t, mica ir
RB72 is kinda like a R24T if that counts, in age its the oldest IRCCM missile had it entered service and not been for the US threatening to cut trade if sweden made their own missiles
1 Like
That way the Meteor precursor, wasn’t it?
I guess that would count, if they actually had adopted it lol
No, RB73 is the precursor to that which was a Skyflash with ramjet air
1 Like
Quick question, does that apply to only ships in one particular tech tree? Or are captured/loaned ships like Royal Sovereign or Guilio Cesare included in that as well?
Also is there any chance the devs could change or relax that rule in the future? Just considering there’s a ton of ships that received one-off or unique fits but are represented in-game in more standardized fits (ie Ise’s Hybrid Battle Carrier fit or Detroit’s experimental late war fit etc).
Additionally is there any chance we might see something like Cesare pop up in the Italian tree or Royal Sovereign in the British tree considering their relative fame and in the case of Cesare, a unique non Soviet fit? Thanks!
There is a huge difference between the R-27 and these other missiles lol
can we please not forget that they promise they gonna add the tor m1 to russia
1 Like
by saying that, you are defending that russia has a missile with no counterparts, but that the west isnt allowed to.
Technically the precursor to the meteor was a Skyflash with a ramjet
I literally posted it Morvran smh
So you did, missed that ]
No, the testbed was the two seat gripen d. Saab marketed the whole gripen e and f as ng, so the gripen ng you are talking about is an early gripen e prototype, which is what brazil tested
Listen, the R-27T/ET should not have been added back then, but you don’t fix that addition by adding missiles that are even more powerful.
Especially when the BRs where the R-27T/ET actually is problematic is 11.7/12.0 lol
Its weird China gets their own domestic missiles but not Sweden, sad…
so you just dont add something because there are no counterparts? That only goes for western equipment tho of course. The kh-38 has no counterpart. The r73 has no counterpart. The r27ET has no counterpart. LMUR etc.
What type of missile are you talking about?
Aaah, aight, mixed up the names
Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to see more prototype and abandoned stuff, but there is a difference between China getting domestic stuff and Sweden not getting prototype stuff lol
Tbf the J35XS is missing its RB27/28, and R13’s.
The F-35 WDNS never used aim-9B nor aim 9N, it only used Swiss modified aim 9b and AIM-9N2
SO yeah its kind of a cope to ask for RB72 but given we have other vehicles lacking historical weapons i think thats not as big of a ask lol. Especially given they would fix some of our vehicles like the Di being 13m0 with only 9L missiles with a terrible flight model and RWR lol
Gaijin is just too lazy to add Aim 9N-2 to the Italian starfighters. (Which i think were only testbeds. Not service like our Drakens.)
1 Like