we have a lot of Israeli Equipment tho
we Bought Spikes (Puma VJTF) and Litening from them
Trophy, Arrow III and more can still be added
1 Like
tbh only thing I want is that new light tank they are working on while it does use the cockerill 105 so not an amazing gun for top tier it does also get 2 fnf atgms
sir this is a Computer game
1 Like
I offer a Solution to this argument:
Move it to the Correct threads and Keep this one Clean of that Trench fight
Let us rather talk about Missile Gens, Submarines or New IFVs that’ll break the game
1 Like
Guys please stop trying to bring Politics in to this topic / any topic as not allowed and will be removed and any more comments will be be meet with time out!
3.1.6 political and religious agitation and propaganda, including propagation of conflicts; discussion of actual political and religious issues is also prohibited due to the provocative nature: we urge you not to draw comparisons between war-historical themes and any of the political events;
6 Likes
Cheers m8
2 Likes
so where was I… ah yes Missiles
would AAM-5/IRIS-T/Python-5/AIM-9X really break the game at this point?
I remember the last times we had this discussion, then about AIM-9L and ARH in general the mainstream Idea was that they’d be very Overpowering, and then came to the game sort of Surprisingly when nobody really expected it
we’ve reached this point again, IMO IIR WVR Missiles wouldn’t break the game too much if they were added in the near future, especially if every nation gets an E-Scan Capable Jet
3 Likes
Just properly seperate this stuff from planes without such weapons
Or add relevant countermeasure at the same time
we should get proper bvr maps first, but that would kill the hype for advance ir missile
yes yes ofc, a New top BR would be needed
but imo like with ARH we could relatively quickly adapt to these missiles by just changing the Meta playstyle again
and then to add, IMO as long as the Lower planes that can meet IIR Missile carriers already have ARH missiles they will not become obsolete
well for that they would have to model BOL correctly, which is one of the relevant countermeasures
also iirc BVVD said that we will only see those missiles once everyone has a plane with MAWs
1 Like
we already have plenty of nicely sized EC type maps in Air RB
ofc we’ll need more, or rather want more, but that wouldn’t break the discussion either
As I say if gaijin wants to add more sub’s nations for the future in which as we all know is happening, then gaijin needs to add everything from that sub nation if they have room to do so.
If not and is willing to bar certain additions because of players will kick off then I think we seriously need to think of a rework on how subs are implemented, I’ve always liked the idea of tabs for subs nations.
2 Likes
Having access to ARHs definitely should be the minimum to able to compete with planes carrying IIR missiles, but I still think that proper countermeasures (preferably a healthy amount as well) are way more important
no what i meant is bigger maps for bigger players base, exemple you can get in sim and play both boats ( modern one ofc) and planes with 2000km open world with awacs and refuel plane, but that would also push gaijin to add cruise missile and bomber
Not this week for sure. Next week is a higher possibility.(but still not set in stone, there are some variables)
5 Likes
I think something that should be needed is variable BR’s for ordinance. That way with the introduction of more advanced missiles people have the option to use them but at the cost of a higher BR or stick with the “worse” missiles so to speak. Also avoids needing to have to grind the exact same vehicle just for a new missile.
I think it could work if done through modifications. As an example if we see AIM-9X added then if you select that modification once unlocked it would raise the BR, but unselecting it would lower your BR.
1 Like
Anything spicy in there ?
so only when USA gets 5th gens lol
Doesn’t have to spill the whole tin of beans you know, it could be a simple yes or no question