honestly your right but considering how new the vehicle is and how much is unknown about the layout it will be a US 10.0-12.0 tank without a turret basket and that alone would make me happy, I’m so tired of being tap lightly by a heat or apfsds round and just losing any ability to combat the enemy cause its become bullshit and unfun the entire top tier lineup right now has turret baskets while so one without can be appreciated.
1 Like
Not to mention the impact I am sure it has on statistics, like i can think of more than a few planes that would probably go up in BR more if they weren’t fighting themselves constantly. Like that has to be skewing the statistics really bad.
1 Like
Yeah, it probably does
Last update, A10 as well. Every top tier needs this…it makes them more killable with systems that can be taken out, not so much missile spam when going down.
Oh nice thanks, I thought only the A-10’s and Su-25’s had this for now, good to see they’re working on them.
So did I. so you arent the only one confused by that
But yes, hopefully everything will get it
With them announcing that bombers are getting reworked, I’m really looking forward to what they’re cooking.
I… am…
Kinda dreading it too, because Gaijins “fixes” can be really hit and miss at times.
What is needed and what they have planned being the same thing is fairly rare
2 Likes
We actually know enough about it to know there is a good chance it will be mediocre:
-
Mobility wise it will be worse than pretty much any of the Abrams, except maybe the SEPv2 with TUSK II equiped.
-
Armor is bad, but then again it’s a light tank.
-
It will have M900 which is okay, but the reload is unknown and up to Gaijin.
So you end up with a light tank with mediocre mobility, that isn’t sneaky as it’s pretty big, and has okay firepower if placed at 11.0 (however it’s firepower becomes mediocre if placed at 11.3+.
1 Like
hopefully HOSBO for the EFTs so they can finally get a FnF weapon even if it is only a glide bomb
Eh, while F&F would be nice, but the Drop speed of Mach 1 makes it kinda meh
Could it be 10.7 or 10.3?
1 Like
better then still being the only top tier jet with zero fnf weapons
Imo 11.0 would be a fine BR for it, you could do 10.7 but it could be argued that would be a bit of a stretch.
However seeing where the VT-5 is I just have a feeling Gaijin will just add it at 11.7 no matter if it’s actually good enough for that BR.
1 Like
Yeah, that restriction on the GBU-62s make them quite undesirable. Hard to get the EFT below M1 half the time
As far as I know the Rafale doesn’t even carry unique weapons in Indian service and the initial Su-30MKI would literally just be a copy of the Su-30SM (yes, I know, the MKI came first IRL, but that’s not the case in-game)
hey would mean KH38MT and Hammers at least lol
Well, a lot of people would like to see blufor and redfor seperated, especially for Sim battles
Not only does it make Sim painful to play when there are carbon copies of your side in the enemy team (or vice verse), it also makes the trees less unique and a lot of the trees less appealing over-all
Why play tree X when tree Y offers copies of tree Xs vehicles as well on top of tree Ys unique stuff
3 Likes
I think the moral of the story is western jets should be on one side and eastern jets on the other so that doesnt happen
1 Like