I can’t even begin to describe how much I dread the mess that would be…
Imagine effectively half a nation in another, then the same nation as it’s own tree with some more vehicles. The entire concept of subtrees has been Gaijin digging a hole they can’t easily dig their way out of without getting buried under a crap ton of dirt.
Did someone post the EAP again?
Hey now you cant complain about gaijin adding copy and paste before unique domestic designs because that means you clearly hate subtrees so just uh… deal with it and stop complaining clearly.
(I cant for the Arjun and Tejas to be rare event vehicle’s and no other domestic Indian design comes)
I’m hoping they are going to revert some sub-TT’s into standalone TT’s.
Like South-Africa with Botswana, Namibia, Lesotho, Swaziland, Zimbabwe, Malawi and Mozambique.
I’m also surprised we haven’t seen a “Sahel states” TT.
I’m not sure what ground/air vehicle would be unique for ww2 brs so we get 1 post war unique vehicle for each branch, place your bets.
Which is why I find tabs for sub trees in the future a good idea, for us Brits we could simply have a tab like this,
Great British Army, Great British Air, bluewater, Coastal, Commonwealth Army, Commonwealth Air
I hope so too, but as a proper rework that doesn’t leave half a nation worth of leftovers in another tree or remove some vital vehicles from those lineups.
Sadly all the easy solution screw over at least one thing massively
If it did, then perhaps it would be considered. But no sub tree is even close to that stage and the very fact something has been added as a sub tree means its already been taken to consideration if it can have a robust standalone tree or not, and proved not to be the case. Hence why it was made a sub tree in the first place.
Pakistani j10Cs are equipped with tvc and it gets regulaten in chinese j10s as well
No the only J-10 to have TVC was the prototype J-10B no J-10C has TVC by anyone
Tbh, with how India and Romania have been implemented I’ve kinda been against the USA or USSR getting subtrees. Or at least until a tree rework.
If it’s this bad with a 5 line nation, then imagine what it would be like with the 2 largest air trees and the third+first largest ground tree.
J10CE have thrust vector, but it will be added to to j10c fleet of china
No ?
Hello dear admin. With all due respect, but I have an awkward question. What about sources of IRIS-T “buff”, where are they? In our game if machine needs a “buff”, gaijin provides one or more sources confirming this buff, so where are they? And why gaijin are so “generous” with that “buff ( yes it’s buff we all know ofc, no doubt )” given to IRIS-T, which was almost useless against MI-28NM and Z10ME? I apologize for this question, but I expect to receive a reasonable answer to it. Thank you.
Hey. The change is explained within the changelog. It was done to increase its IRCM resistance due:
I would like a copy paste Su30mki and a copy paste rafale.
Idk why everyone is against copy paste
But it made it worse. Just say it was a nerf instead of lying.
Every other sam has a 10km ir range, but only the SLM is at 4km. Literally on par with an Aim9b
Because they have a nice habit of coming in place domestic or unique vehicles that would have fit better.
Looking at the last 2-3 subtrees they added and it doesn’t take a genius to see why people are getting annoyed.
As for the Rafale and Su-30 i would ge fine with them if they actually got unique armaments but knowing gaijin there is a good chance they wont do that.
Thanks. Yes, I’ve seen it. I won’t talk about “increasing the IRCM” and this is just nerf, but there are no official sources I’ve seen confirming these 4km change.Yes, it’s considered as buff ( how convenient ), but I remember when the RDF LT and HSTVL got their buff, it was supported by one source. In our case, there are no sources. If we all continue to play dumb, we can just ask: “Hey gaijin, you buffed the IRIS-T, it is so powerful and you’ve made it nore powerful, where are the sources of the buff and what the hell are you doing”. Again I apologize for all I said previously if it was offensive
Idk man, I like the variety they add to tt. Makes for some interesting line ups