he was being pedantic because the spice250 was limited to 8 instead of 16 so in his mind that means they are just removing 8 from the total not limiting it to just 8 hence the 20
1 Like
they dont need to remove helipads they need to nerf LIRDCM, model the rotors for RCS and remove multi pathing for top tier SAMs, oh and model DL for top tier SAMs as well
5 Likes
Id certainly move the closest heli-pad to be a part of the AF, also has the added bonus of providing a little spawn protection, as for the other. Id keep it, but move it further away, leaves players the choice of where to spawn which is needed, but also mitigates their effectiveness. Has been needed for a while, but the new FnF ATGMs is just stupid
As for moving the AF further away, is needed for all CAS, but really comes down on a map to map basis
1 Like
If only they had just refrained from adding extremely problematic weapons, eh?
I am personally fine with what would normally be problematic weapons I just think they should not be able to be used in GRB. Like MMW brimstone in ARB or SIM? yeah I would be fine with that but keep it as far away from tank battles as possible.
as for stuff like helicopters and JAGM/LMUR? well I am in the camp that helicopters were a mistake and should have never been added in the first place (despite having the entire Russian heli tree).
Oh I agree with that but i still don’t think helicopters should be able to near instantly land and rearm after shooting off all their missiles within a few seconds of spawning so either remove helipads or move them much farther back and force people to actually fly to a position within range to use their weapons.
1 Like
Wait I just realized the Hawk 209 being in Japan means we can potentially see an Indonesian BTR-4 alongside the Thai BTR-3s…
Spoiler
3 Likes
Loving the missile carrier
Already feeling the pain of being autocannon spammed by the other two
The ATGM carrier is nice since it has two types of missiles, one being HE, the other tandem-HEAT with 800mm of penetration to punch through ERA. It has thermals too.
1 Like
If only Gaijin agreed with the sentiment that certain air to ground weapons just shouldn’t be available in GRB. For ARB (especially EC) and ASB they can go ham for all I care, I would even welcome certain air to ground weapons being added to plane only modes, but GRB just keeps getting worse with every new CAS weapon that is added.
I hate the CAS/SPAA arms race, I hate that people keep justifying this back and forth just because they feel like its justified for one side to be superior after another side suffered for a while.
What happened to just balancing the game?
I think helis are a cool addition, but I can see where you are coming from. It feels like the way they implemented helis couldn’t have been any worse…
2 Likes
5 Likes
Chinese or Swedish ?
Cold War era battleship ?
Before gajin introduce the early cold war era heavyweight strategic bomber turbojet engine
The USA tech tree none bomber aircraft from late WW2 ~ the early cold war era (BR 6.0 ~ 6.7) and the early bomber aircraft turbojet engine era (before B-57 Canberra)
Sweden is far more likely than china all us norsk peeps have had a navy for a long time. China really is more like isreal of Naval, would make less sense to give them a naval tree befote sweden
@Smin1080p_WT under which area can we report issues with the CBR?
Because its an Flashbang!
Edit: I like how this gets Flagged…
While Vanguard and leaked Jean Bart is also cold war era battleship, Iowa class in cold war are actually
weaker than WW2 version.
No hydroplane, less AA, less crew, and weaker engine(exclusively in 1980s)
Also, Soyuz and current Iowa with reloading time buffed
(possible as current her reload is including gun aligning time,
which is excluded on Yamato/Musashi and Nagato)
can go to 9.0 without any other change.
used other aircraft
better FCS for it though, and in 80’s the Phalanx is obviously much more capable than manual bofors
Only radar change, basic plotting computer is same.
No, effective range is shorter and has storage for only 20 seconds burst.
Helis were not usable in naval now, and even shipborne helis were introduced, they were unable to capture point and inferior in armament and speed
Also, loss of crew is extremely severe.
For example, Missouri’s 1945 crew complement is over 3,100 while in 1980s her crew is less than 1,900.
Sister ships were less reduced but not because they have more crew in 1980s, but because they have smaller crew number in 1945.
Is that your red circle around the M1A2T or is it from the guy who you screenshotted it from?
What does that have to do with the Ajax?
Do you mean the very small text in the top?
Lore accurate