until that happens no reason the Ajax shouldnt be 10.3 lol we can argue as much as you want but I see little reason for it to be 10.7
Yeah but thats the thing the 9040C just dies instantly also no spall liner on the Front, people keep forgetting that.
Does it not?
I’m feeling like the British military doesn’t know what a good vehicle design is, if it doesn’t
Ngl the BVVD interview kinda sucked
Ajax was designed to have as much space to fit electronic equipment as physically possible so they went with a massive manned turret.
It is crewless ish
Crew are not needed in the turret but they can get in it
The Ajax IFV
Yeah by the crew sitting in the turret it’s manned
At most it’s 10.3, Sidegrade or a bit better than 9040C
So they really looked at the PUMA and said
“You know, this looks pretty good, but you know what this really needs? The turret being the biggest weakspot.”
Depends on the Britain Tax
true lol
Mark my words it’ll be 11.0
Given we dont have a single 11.0 or 11.3 ground vehicle… probably
And where would you place the Flanker? At the top (hypothetical 14.7) or leave it at 14.3?
The positive things for me was bomber survivability, the random vehicle mechanic that we already heard about, and the new “Aerial warfare” mode, even though we don’t have any details I’m happy to hear it’s coming.
If Gaijin buffs the reload then sure but this makes it basically a worse 9035 at 10.3 for anti tank roles
Imma just be real Puma is better than AJAX by having the unmanned turret alone, i think Puma will win in survivability as well and at 10.3 BR where it’s at a bigger caliber won’t help in frontal engagements anyway and sides are still easy because there’s not as much K5
So it being more than 10.3 would not make any sense
true what im hoping is
Ajax 10.3
Blackjax 10.7-11.0
Boxer LMUK 11.0
Ajax IFV 11.0-11.3
Yeah, looks about right to me
Good question tbh, I’m not even sure.
Puma gets shot in the turret it instantly blows the tracks off and without any way to escape or defend lol
