Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

Game Discussion General Discussion
2952

Apex predators:

  • F-16A-10, Netz, F-16A ADF, F-16A MLU. All released at the same time but the MLU was better from the start iirc.

Air superiority:

  • F-15A, F-15A Baz and F-15J. F-15J (Japan) was the best of the 3.

  • Su-27 and J-11 released at the same time. Can’t remember which one was better.

  • Gripen A for Sweden and Gripen C for UK (through South Africa). Similar performance wise.

Seek and Destroy:

  • F-15C MSIP II, Baz Meshupar, F-15J(M). Again the F-15J(M) was the best.

  • Su-27SM, J-11A. This time the Su-27SM was better.

Firebirds:

  • F-15E, F-15I. F-15E is better for ground strike but F-15I is better for air.

Hornet’s sting:

  • F-18C, F/A-18C(late). Released in the same update but the US one was significantly better.

So yeah I can go back even further if I wasn’t on my phone during my break, but these don’t line up with your claim.

3 Likes
2953

image
image1596×889 340 KB

hmmmm what’s going on with the flags, i didn’t select those

2 Likes
2954

also M44

2 Likes
2955

So why was the Oplot added to Japan and China then?

Where would a Korean K2 go, hmm? Oh, right, Korea is not a tech tree or a subtree.

A K2 operated by Poland can still be added without a Korean one being added first. Why?
BECAUSE KOREA IS NOT A TECH TREE OR SUB TREE

2956

again, proving the wrong thing,

same with the fox3 missile, they were added for all tree a not one only, or you some people will crazy calling bais and favorisme

1 Like
2957

Starts naming NATO vehicles instead

4 Likes
2958

Imagine showing this to a war thunder beta player

3 Likes
2959

This man forgot about the Phoenix

2960

Diversity or smth

1 Like
2961

They both were equally bad if you remember Flanker’s butchered FM on release

3 Likes
2962

explain to me one thing, why would the dev thing its good to add polish tree who is most korea export while they can just add korea itself,

2963

Because the Polish tech tree could only bring 3 Korean vehicles 💀

3 Likes
2964

I call it favorisme for adding poland over korea.

2965

Oh, I don’t know, maybe because Poland would be easier to implement?
Or because Poland is a way more requested nation than Korea?
Or because Korea would be full of C&P as well, so both nations wouldn’t be that interesting to have as tech trees or subtrees at the end of the day?

2 Likes
2966

“Poland wouldn’t work because it’s mostly soviet stuff” “Too many NATO vehicles” “Should be a Korean Subtree because of exports”

Why not both Korea and Poland as separate nations?

6 Likes
2967

Good that we agreed on something, now the put end at thi nonsense.

Poland can come any time, k2 is dev decisions to add export first or the original from korea.

2968

I still don’t get this one. What’s the significant connection between Poland and Korea?
Just exports? That’s not a good reason to turn a nation into a subtree

4 Likes
2969

Yea but which one, you cant say it can a sub tree but have no place to put it

2970

Poland and Korea are collaborating more on development of vehicles but it still doesn’t justify this idea since it only started happening recently

2971

I never claimed either one of those nations should be subtrees