spice,ROC/TW will take it as a main meal
all ROC/TW future vehicles are spice
compared to m1a2t,I prefer idf,it is a independent vehicle
Just making sure it’s still being worked on
Hey. Generally the reports would be updated if so. But this is also unlikely outside of major update. As new weaponry options are normally added then.
Say Smin, quick question. is there any possibility that the U.S. Tech Tree might also get the Oplot-M in the future? Or even the Object 478 BEM-1?
Just considering the vehicle is still in active use by the U.S. Army (along with the Object 478BEM-1/2 that were specifically built for the U.S.), to me it would seem like there’s enough justification to add them. I mean they seem to be similar enough to what happened to to the Pakistani Oplot, though unlike said Oplot the U.S. still uses them.
1 Like
Hey. There is generally always a possibility of most things in some form perhaps some day unless we have already ruled something out. But as you can imagine, we cant go vehicle by vehicle confirming or denying or giving a yes / no.
So sadly its not possible to give answers on spesific vehicles in most cases.
about oplot,I’d rather have this one
2 Likes
If the US was to get one, it’d likely be the Object 478BEM-1/2 and not the Oplot-M (there’s barely any difference). Pakistan trialed both the Oplot-M and Oplot-P.
Interestingly though, it’s name would likely be the T-80UD (as that is the official designation for the US Army).
We could also see an American “Oplot-2M” (Object 478DU10)
1 Like
Me too, but this does at least make it more likely the Oplot-P could be added to the main techtree at some point, instead of being in the premium section.
1 Like
That’s fair, I was just wondering if your denial on the original Oplot thread was just in reference to the Spearhead or in general, that’s all.
Additionally do you know if we can expect another Roadmap blog down the road? It’s been over a year since the last one, or has that concept beyretired in favor of the CM notes?
Can you do a bit of butt kicking / vigorous poking please?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/zQnQiLTckFCC
There are accepted reports going back as far as 3 months and we still dont have functional GBUs
(The oldest known accepted report currently Report)
1 Like
As we mentioned towards the end of last year, yes, the more regular community updates that come more frequently and cover a range of topics are the new format of things.
1 Like
Hey. As i said just above ^
Nothing new to report.
1 Like
oops
Any news about… :P
Its still currently open.
Edit: oh I thought you meant your report :p
Well. I do want to know about that. An entire class of weapons being near unusable for 3+ months is a major problem (especially as we’ve had 2x Major updates in that time). But the second post was me just joking about the Q&A
2 Likes
also smin, when is the dev gonna change the current added vehicules of this update, consider to add to this update in the suggerstion forum list.