Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion

good for you. try playing the game and not posting non factual propaganda

1 Like

yea i think helis with more op FnFs were a bad idea. they should have atleast fixed arh SAMs before adding them. cus they can easily notch arh missiles.

1 Like

F-16C PoBIT was also a valid alternative but yeah the golden eagle is a pretty good pick I guess

Su-30 mk2 pack…Gaijin…i’m getting more tired of this game with each update. They better introduce long waited life improvements on AirRB and GroundRB or this might be it for me.

well they can just hover and they are invincible to ARH, the blades are not modelled to be moving so ARH cant detect it.

1 Like

Its definetly at a breaking point. They focus on new vehicles and premiums, but not on the game itself. The game needs to be fun and the modes need to be fun. The current modes are just ass and it makes no sense that they dont try to fix the core part of the game which is the gamemodes that we play.

There are counterparts tho. You just refuse to acknowledge them. Kh-38s arent any wonder weapon either. Just go nd play with Su-30 yourself, where all your Khs get intercepted by SPAA and you have to defending from Rafales and EFTs spawncamping you. LMURs are pain to play against yes, but only cause Gaijin gave Mi-28/Z-10 and Apache E IRCM immunity bubble. If they tune it down,it will be fine.

Do you know what a counterpart is? I mean that brimstones, mavericks etc are not close to being as good as the kh-38’s, period.

2 Likes

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Y5BrZ6gGHVXX
Also AJ 168 is supposed to have a datalink, similar to kh-59. However gaijin doesn’t plan to add MITL(Man in the loop).

I never said they are. But then its just difference in NATO vs Russian doctrine. Where like Morvran mentioned before, NATO cares about reducing collateral damage,meanwhile Russia dont. Go complain to NATO countries why they havent made 150 kg TNT missiles but went for Brimstone instead.

Given that you’ve simply never played USSR or China in ground rb on your account, maybe you should inform yourself?

Right! It’s clear they don’t play the game and they don’t know it’s the brokest it is ever been (except the one update where missiles didn’t work).

1 Like

Yep! The main thing is the F-15C is at least fast enough to make good use of its AIM-120s. And the APG-63(V)3 will provide it with good situational awareness to compound that.

While the EF and Rafale definitely still have an edge in medium to close range engagements, the F-15C GE should at least be able to keep its distance and be more capable in BVR.

1 Like

i hace played agaisnt it.

1 Like

Grass is always greener. No substitute for actual experience.

1 Like

But never with it. I also thought some things are OP,until i played with em,and turns out its just playerbase being smoothbrained and they arent that great.

counterpoint : you don’t need tons of TNT to kill a tank IRL (you know when it hits with thre right angle and doesn’t go for the track)

dude, youre still denying that kh-38’s are better than mavericks. They are. EVERY SINGLE STAT. doesnt matter if i have played with them or no

1 Like

Like take Toptier SAMs addition. They are so buggy, they make them spawn 2 km away from enemy tanks which is sooo unrealtic, the maps for CAS are so freakying small and still we have no news on fixing that gamemode. Like I have so many ideas to make it better, I find it weird they seems to have any. It must be intentional, probably having a frustrating game makes people buy new stuff.

We haven’t announced anything regarding this. As always, we don’t comment on rumours, leaks or speculation.

1 Like