israel with 10.0 “lights” in 11.3 (when one of them is literally worse in every way, but above it in the tech tree) but sure.
1 Like
yeah sadly they went with trophy over iron fist so the APS will be meh but a 5 second reload on DM53 or a 6.5 second reload with DM63 or even DM73 would make it 12.0 material, obviously we still have the Challenger L/51 to look forward to but I doubt gaijin wants to add a modern 130mm
edited to have a better image to show off the size difference
1 Like
It’s adopted ? By US? XM-30 i mean
Not yet.
huffing hopium for the bmpt-72
Well if not adopted we know where it suppose to be :)
it not built yet I think. the best you can get now is a turreted unturreted Bradley
Chat gpt said they were gonna be buliding more prototypes and that they maybe will start production in like 2027-2029
Please don’t use chat gpt for sources, it can often get things confused
2 Likes
Yea i know but this wasn’t a suggestion it was just an fast answer to his question
Is the introduction of the Sukhoi-35S planned for this year? T-14 “Armata”?
1 Like
No, i eated them both sorry
1 Like
Armata can’t make it, it broke down on the way
3 Likes
its not needed
I eated the engine parts, not enough tape and glue to fix it
sure love getting crew lock from having my launchers die
3 Likes
In all fairness, the lower plate is still a big weak spot on the 2A7 against top tier shells.
Everything in the red area has a KE protection value of less than 500mm, so its not stopping any top tier APFSDS.
Both tanks will have LFP weak spots. The 2A7 also dosent have any spall liners on the LFP on the drivers side, while the CR3 should have spall liners on the entire LFP (as does the CR2 irl)
The CR3 armour protection against top tier APFSDS should look a bit like this, with red being a significant weak spot and orange being areas that may be a weakspot to stronger shells.
The mantlet irl appears to now be solid with composite (as the TOGS is removed, removing the need for the wiring for the TOGS to be in the mantlet), but its going to depend on if gaijin model that.
3 Likes
Considering neither design is even finalized I’d say no one gets it lol.
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12094#:~:text=The%20Army’s%20Optionally%20Manned%20Fighting,programmatic%20and%20cost-associated%20reasons.