is there any plans to add a top BR tank or plane to either India or SA in the tech tree? because as of right now they do nothing to bolster top tier at all which supposedly they were added to fill gaps or capabilities that the UK lacks
Swiss: F-18C Late
Thai land: Oplot T (I guess techncally the Thai Gripen is the tide highest jet in the tree but not top br)
Hungary: 2A7HU
NL: Leopard 2A6NL
Finland :Leopard 2A6
meanwhile for the UK
SA:TTD (10.3) and adds nothing that wasnt already there
India: T-90 Bhishma (10.7) neither of these tanks are high enough to even see top tier never mind actually counting as one
my only issues with the UK subtrees is they completely lack end of the line equipment, the closest you could count is the SA gripen but its heavily outclassed by the EFT (and its worse then other C models due to the R-Darter being terrible vs AMRAAM)
You left out the part where the SA Gripen was the UK top tier for some time and its only viable option as many of the others on out list here.
Sub trees are also not just for top tier additions, but gap filling across the tree. Indeed more Indian and Commonwealth vehicles are planned for the future.
There is nothing to re-report. They have been fixed to as close as the real world performance as possible and therefor have no further possible changes. This has been answered by the devs already.
@Smin1080p_WT btw, you kinda walked arround Thai vehicles designed/made at china both during the community reply & at CM disclose today, I think its important that you allow Thai VT-4 and VN-1C (the ones that started all the chinese community complaint) into the game… now you’re gonna add a US MBT to china (i think everyone can guess its the M1A2T) and i dont see anyone rioting about seeing one of the most advanced vehicles in the US going to China. That should go both ways, and give Thailand those vehicles whenever they were planned.
while I wont deny that the grippen for the time was out top fighter (even if they had to make it VERY unrealistic to make it so) it doesnt change the complete lack of a top br tank
india so far added 2 SPAA in a BR gap where we have 3 domestic options, the T-90 at BR where we again have 3 domestic options and now a SA MBT the only other thing it added was a jagaur thats only selling point was Magic 2s sorry if I find it hard to belivie india has done much in the way of adding to the tree that we dont already have
I will break it down to a final time to conclude the subject so this thread can move on.
The game is a game. There are physical limitations as to what can be replicated in the games framework when it comes to aircraft performance. The Tornados fall well within the acceptable performance margin to the point where the changes do not provide any significant benefits to the overall gameplay of the vehicle and simply cannot be replicated in game without further compromises to the vehicles performance, making it more incorrect in other areas due to the complexities of swing wings.
I would still like to get justification for the state of BOL and when it will be fixed.
Tornados, Harriers, Gripens, Viggens, F-18s, F-14 and even the Typhoon, have one of their core strengths so completely gutted that its almost a waste of weight and drag to equip
Its never been a requirement for a sub tree to add a top BR tank. That is not their sole purpose.
These were requested by British community players and had no impact on domestic options.
It was not purely about BR gaps, but gameplay gaps a vehicle variety, as we have explained many times.
You missed out the Bison and Marut too, as well as the other Indian vehicle as well.
But on top of this, as we have said, more Indian vehicles will come. Again, we have no news to report on them today at this very moment, otherwise we would have done so in the CM disclosures, so there is nothing further for me to add here.
BOL is modelled as we have said based on how the developers have concluded it performed with the available information. Two suggestion reports are present on it, but as these are suggestions there is no ETA. It depends on conclusive materials.
This has nothing to do with this topic once again, and we appear to be back on the off topic train.
never said that they stopped additions I was pointing out in capability they added nothing as they were no gaps
what does the T90 add in that regard? I guess a some what armoured UFP but if its mobility or firepower the Vicker Mk7 is at the same BR
sorry forgot about them the Marut is neat as a fully domestic option the bison is ehhh I could take or leave it
fair enough my complaints were more that every other Sub nation goes to the top BR in some way shape or form but india and SA dont funny enough the only thing we got that has is the Aussie F/A-18A+ which isnt a subtree but still nice
Then that was clearly incorrect information with 0 basis in reality. Chaff is the easiest to explore.
The fact that the catridge is 18% lighter (even though it has greater volume) shouldnt have justified a 75% reduction in effective performance.
That is just insane.
What next? Removing the Typhoons ability to supercruise because the devs beleive the Mach 1.5 is a marketing lie?
Which should have been provided by both Flame and Gunjob on the day the original nerf was implemented.
If you would like to respond in the British Weapon Systems thread then be my guest. However, a game breaking and fundemental issue like this needs to be resolved ASAP and should be a high priority change.
