Should be at the end of the week if not then at the beginning of next
So HQ-16 is very likely as it will be on par with Mamba and SAMPT?
dont worry, when we get the hq-16 or any other new system it’ll be gimped beyond belief cause we can’t have nice things :)
True. The CS/SA5 is still extremely broken, radar doesnt see anything on it, the missiles have weird trajectory and are easy to flare off. They still dont have working datalink.
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT is there any reason why the dev did not give the bmd4m2 its 30mm apfsds round and put it in a high br. we all know that russia tree still missing its light tanks at top tier.
Ju-88P with convertible cannon armament. It will make me donate to GJN
1 Like
Personally i think its fine where it is and i would rather have the K-25, or Bumerang as a high tier light tank for the USSR
Most likely due to the old cardboard base.
Apparently, the gun on the BMDs can not fire APFSDS.
I realy want my 32 pdr centurion
What is that lineup, that actually hurts to look at
You not having the AMD spaded hurts my soul, that is the best vehicle in that lineup imo next to the H.35
Apparently that’s factually incorrect as it’s a standard Sinitsa turret and fire control system, along with the gun.
Default HQ-16 would arguably be worse than the HQ-17 or CS/SA5. Multi system ARH SAMS are miserable against anything but premium Timmies all you have to do is fly <60m and it won’t do anything
The 2a72 and 2a42 use the same ammunition, the only difference is in the gun’s characteristics.
that’s like 90% of the forums.
3 Likes
(ok i’ll stop now)
1 Like
Ki-Ne moment