How
CV9040 but it has a special skin, take it or leave it
Swedish girlfriends for every wt player I hope
what would be great would be like the CV90 MK4 50MM
Im drooling over the idea of having it (why did we get the mediocre mk4 variant)
Support on bug report and opinions on polls would be very appreciated!
Spoiler
Thank You
2 Likes
@NEONbruh
Static thrust is only used on the runway. This is the only slightly weaker Su-27SM engines.
As for the numbers:
Su-27SM: 184 seconds to mach 1.5. 5 minutes to mach 2 [video broke after that].
F-15E: 145 seconds to mach 1.5. 4 minutes to mach 2.
F-15JM: 176 seconds to mach 1.5. 5 minutes to match 2.
Su-30SM: 222 seconds to mach 1.5. 6 minutes to mach 2.
The Su-27SM is the fastest Flanker ever produced, having a high thrust engine coupled with the lower weight 16,700kg empty, and shorter wingspan over Su-35, and no canards compared to Su-30SM series.
Even if you want to say the 3.6% more thrust of the 41F-1S is enough… the Su-35 weighs 15.7% more than Su-27SM, while having 2 more feet of wingspan.
And seeing how Su-27SM barely keeps up with F-15JM, Su-35 won’t.
Su-35 will have a good radar, and will be better than Su-30SM. It however won’t be objectively better than the other 14.3s.
Interesting info, good job, really. :)
It wont be meta, nothing can beat Rafale yet, but it will be still way better than new F-15C GE on 14.3, i prefer versatile 50g missiles rather than high speed, high altitude “missile bus” with only 8 missiles against 14, its my personal opinion but anyway. I really hope what atleast in the next update in december they will give F-15C GE 16 missile to balance it.
1 Like
F-15C GE was never cleared for missile count upgrades.
It can get BOL pods tho, which against 12* R-77s is more than enough.
He have both but not at the same time, you can either take BOL pod and 2 missiles or 4 missiles without BOL. I prefer 4 missiles.
Do you have a single source stating those quad wing pylons are actually functional?
All ive heard so far is that those are just a mockup and it hasnt actually been fitted.
As for the double belly racks. Those will probably come with the F-15EX
1 Like
That is currently a National Guard aircraft, and was used in testing.
Its results are not universal across all F-15Cs.
So far I’ve only seen F-15EX with potential integration.
Giving M1A1 11.7 in GAB when M1A1 HC has 12.0 its such a crime. M1A1 turret can be pen by IPM1 APFSDS imagine trying to beat 2A7 in this tank when u cant flank cuz of markers
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/amber.htm
https://www.ang.af.mil/Portals/77/documents/ang_priorities_books/2018%20Mod%20Book.pdf
1 Like
It’s not quad pylon. It is literally most outer F-15EX pylon but on sta 2/8
3 Likes
Oh, i know you, saw your report, good job though but moderator is blind or smth :)
I mean same could be said for the T-80B that got the thermals that were only tested on like 1-2 T-80Bs for testing.
EDIT: or the F-5C flares is another popular one to list.
Not at all.
It was dozens of T-80Bs given drop-in observation thermals. The only wiring needed is power.
That’s like adding a light to vehicle.
Of course, observation thermals shouldn’t have reticles, but War Thunder doesn’t have separate optics channels at this time, let alone better optics simulation.
Or the T-80U
1 Like