if US could get more of its stuff that would be preferable to a subtree imo but ppl are opposed to it for some reason
I think they meant that they didnt want america getting 5 different vehciles every update while some nations get nothing despite having a number of vehicles to add still. Gaijin will act like a nation hasnt got any more vehicles to add and then give it a sub tree despite there being more than enough.
Russia and america are the two nations i think will never need a sub tree with how many prototypes and concepts they’ve made, so maybe slowing it down a bit and actually giving some minor nations some vehicles wouldnt hurt. And if that means jets like the australian or swedish hornet go to other nations, so be it as long as the variants made by the us go to the us.
3 Likes
thats all of the hornets
1 Like
US players don’t know what subs mean, they often want a all out buffet with just US things but as we all know a buffet means everything that on the table.
1 Like
You are aware that is technically contradictory to the previous statement?
I’m hoping you mean; variants operated by the US gose to the US, which doesn’t contradict the previous statement.
i can work with that for F-15’s at least
If something has a forwarded report, then the devs will be aware of an issue.
Please report any issues you believe with the evidence here: Community Bug Reporting System
You’re telling me this is perfectly normal? I could send so many clips of how completely horrible it is to drive, how about it getting stuck in spawn unable to climb slight hills, or the vehicle refusing to turn past 20kph if you can get it that fast.
Im explaining whats required to please report it in the correct place: Community Bug Reporting System
This topic is not the place to report bugs.
To check if a specific issue is known with a vehicle, you can search on the CBR using the search function. If you do not see a forwarded report, then it is likely not known.
could you please bump this report just look at it and youll see why its very tiring waiting for a big bug to be fixed thanks :D
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/fsQsRgkWZkcc
Nonsense! Every US player comes ingrained with the knowledge of what subs are. Love those long sandwiches.
SUB ??? is it Uboat time ???
1 Like
Elde 98 Mobility // Issues Community Bug Reporting System
Created, of course ill probably need to make a new one but given how its nearly impossible to play it on some maps i can only hope it doesn’t get the CV90 MK.IV treatment and just left on accepted for a year.
That’s 90% of the bug reports, heck a number are even longer than that.
Trust me, i waited 3 years for the Finnish Leo camos to be corrected. And nearly 6 years for the majority of swedish aircraft to get their respective corrections but trust me, their accepted, just gotta wait :_)
I have a feeling there won’t be until other nations get better equivalents as well. For example, AAM-4 being unnerfed or AAM-4B being added.
Seems like the AIM-120C-5 was just a token addition to give the impression that air got something new too.
1 Like
yup, was mid game typing that (the life of a bomber main, the vautour have a ground spawn now btw… kill me). Thats what i meant.
1 Like
Genuinely asking here, do we have any unclassified sources claiming the AIM-120C-5 is underperforming? I’d love to see it buffed, but I cannot find hard numbers or statements regarding how it was improved.
From what I’ve gathered from others, it should have:
- Changed booster (already correct in game)
- Less drag due to fins being smaller (already correct in game)
- A relatively significant improvement to range (only partially correct in game – needs better autopilot)
- Better HOBS performance (very incorrect in game – needs better fin AOA and autopilot)
- Better ECCM (still missing in game – needs better seeker)
- Low smoke motor (still missing in game – should copypaste from the 9M/9X)
Again, I’d like to see the 120C-5 be the improvement it should be, but we also have to PROVE that these things are true.
This does also highlight the issue with Gaijin’s bug report system. They can simply make up incorrect specs for classified vehicles/weapons and ignore best-guess work since it’s not “specific enough”. It’s kinda hard to prove something is incorrect if “proper” sources are classified.
4 Likes
They certainly need to come up with a better policy now we are in current era tech and thus getting sources for things is gunna be hard work
As these have been rather well reported so far, but denied because it didnt have leaked classified information
1 Like
Hey @Smin1080p_WT ,sorry to bother you but I have a question.
Are bug reports region-specific or they can be reviewed by any manager via some sort of translator?