iirc, it covered a lot of nations, but Id guess it would have 1 primary nation. Probably something like Poland and then I cant think of any reason why any and all WARSAW pact vehicles couldnt be added to such a tree if/when needed.
Like how Britain is the entirity of the Commonwealth or Sweden is all of Scandanvia
Atm the only nation that has a high chance at getting ukraine stuff is japan with thailand… that’s including 3 BTRs and the T-84
Could also expand that with the Indonesian BTR-4
Japan is pretty much on the way of becoming the games Ukraine substitute
I’m wondering about where the AB-13 would go as it’s Ukrainian built but was intended for use by Jordan
Idk man… UK? already have the Al Khalid
Rumours? It’s been in full blown leak lists.
wasnt that same leak list say that next gen jets were coming this year tho…
and not everything on those lists actually comes to the game or comes to the game in the way it says it would.
like one of those leaks said that the EFT and Rafale were delayed and werent coming in the december update…
Still waiting for the A-6E SWIP
Yeah, thats more of a meme these days than an actual leak.
But that would mean there would be no need to grind other nations.
Poland - Leopard 2, M1, K2, T-72
F-16, MiG 29 and F-35
Czech - 2A4, T-72
Gripen, F-35
Ukraine - CR2 (poor them) T-80s, T-64s, Leopard 2s, M1s
F-16, Su-27, MiG 29, Mirage 2000
We just rehash the one nation has everything argument.
Same can be said for britain at the moment, especially what some people want added.
But Just because Poland could get all, doesnt mean they will
Yeah that was the joke, everyone loses their mind when a Canadian Leopard could be added to the UK.
Yet sure Eastern european tree…pure copy and paste excluding some Ukraine T-80 and BTR variants
I mean, Czechoslovakia alone has 100+ ground vehicles that are either different to in game vehicle variants or completely new altogether. There’s also the Donets spaa, Vab MK3 SICH, Otaman 3, Kevlar E, 7tp, Biala, Rys and AB-13 from Ukraine and Poland (obviously missing plenty of other vehicles from those 2, let alone a few bits and bobs from the Baltic states).
This means that we could exclude any vehicles that wouldn’t have any gameplay differences from the ones in game (namely the Ukrainian challenger 2 and gepard)
3 nations split between a single tree there will not be room for every unique vehicle.
Its T-34, T-54 and T-72 copy paste
With a smatering of high tier NATO vehicles.
And how many of those unique vehicles do you think they’ll actually add vs just copying whatever’s already in game and slapping a new camo on it?
Belgium has plenty of IFVs we could add and we got none.
They added Hungary and the entire air tree is copied over.
Unfortunately that’s a gajin thing.
I know licensing is a big problem but it’s also that copy and paste is a time and money saver.
That being said, if a tree has potential, I feel like there’s still hope, even if it means waiting.
Here’s a proposal of a Czechoslovakia tree. It can very well stand on its own with minimal copy paste and folders (keep in mind the largest in a tech tree is 4 and in the event tab, it can go up to seven vehicles in a folder). Of course not every vehicle is likely to get in, so some of the vehicles can be replaced by Polish, Ukrainian or Baltic vehicles (maybe Bulgaria aswell if it’s not locked in to Italy)
Isn’t this just contradicting yourself? Saying there won’t be enough room for unique vehicles and then chalking it all down to T-series.
An independent tree would be the best way to get the most unique vehicles and mods in. It’s extremely tiring to keep seeing several tree and subtrees being chalked to “T-80/F-16/Leopard/Gripen” while completely ignoring most of the unique vehicles and mods.
We can only try but when people start calling tech from subs useless on no real bases, you know I’ll jump on that as it’s not fair to call something useless without a good reason other than I dislike that thing.
Everything should have a home in war thunder but at the same time it should be implemented correctly.
So is China’s similarity to Russia