Unless we start with something along the lines of B and S again
that is a very unfortunate abreviation
Oh, may you conquer the summit this time as well.
There are already some ““leak”” lists?
only for hte Thai ground sub tree
which got confirmed in the CM disclosure
no mike is still need more rest you know
I was hoping for the usual Crazy stuff pre devblog season
Atleast we are atill in Part 1 xD
Big ships? No that’s not right…
Buks? Nah couldn’t …
British Spitfires? Already have those…
Uhhhhh…
That’s the thing, the Hornets being mid doesn’t mean they are bad.
It’s just that they are only really able to exert pressure in the mid game. Early game they are at the Mercy of the EFT/F-15E&I/Su-30SM and late game they are at the mercy of the EFT/Rafale.
The fact that the Hornets are so dependent on other planes at the same BR means that it’s just mid, however that doesn’t mean they are unplayable or even straight up bad.
some one hand me the link pls. i need to prepare myself
https://tieba.baidu.com/home/main?id=tb.1.ff42df28.od1urJJKKQMaTINUcU3D4g?t=1532154447&fr=pb
You could alsos see it on the DC
Pretty much just a Chinese SLAM in practice right?
With no MBTs or IFVs for top tier, a Rapier multi-vehicle would be fun for the 10.3/10.7 line up
samp/t has much more range than buk m3
they wont add j-16 before su35. they will probably add them at the same time.
buk m3 uses fox 3 missiles. there is a launcher than can carry 12 missiles in a single vehicle or another with a radar + 6 missiles , they can add 1 radar + 2x launchers (24 missiles) totally or can go with 2x launcher with smaller radar (12 missiles totally). compared to 8 missiles per launcher in samp/t. (16 totally).
DEV!!!!!!!!!!!!!