Because the F-4F ICE was planned to come.
so, the F-4F ( after the release of the F-4F early) was not?
im saying that the F-4F early wont get CMs cuz the F-4F exists…
cant wait for the that day. hell freezes over, world peace is achieved and everyone will be holding hands and sing Kumbaya
this time is germany suffer?
Its not clear what you are talking about anymore…
All 3 variants were planned from the get go, with the differences and equipment they have.
I would ask for a final time that the off topic stop now. Your question was answered. This has nothing to do with the topic anymore.
1 Like
its the usual < plane x > misses X loudout, just happens to be the F4F this time
Those are kind of the next gen. Missiles like the R-73M, Aim-9X-I, MICA-IR, IRIS-T, AAM-3, and PL-10 would likely be the first wave of new IR AAMs added.
The next generation to be added would likely comprise of the R-74/R-74M, ASRAAM, Aim-9X-II, AAM-5, PL-10E, Python 5, and the A-Darter if it finally gets produced and delivered.
Just saying Python 4 isn’t on the same level as most of those missiles you listed there. Python 5 is however.
1 Like
so there was no point in time since the f4f was released, gaijin thought about giving it 9Ls despite its the correct loudout
Do i need to remember you that gaijin tried to shutdown the reports of ICE missing 9L/i? was that also planned from the getgo
Tbh Python 4 is somewhere in between and is closer to AAM-3 than any of those
Im just waiting on RB72, RB71B and RB73
Also more Falcon missiles. I dont care about new next gen missiles. The ones i suggested above are old as can be and would probably be too hard to balance.
Once again, plans from dev blogs can change.
We even leave a disclaimer on every blog now so that its clear:
" Please note that this vehicle’s characteristics may be changed before it is added to the game."
1 Like
that wasnt my question
1 Like
Hi Smin,
The fixing of the trophy APS on the Merkava mk4M and the Namer tzhrihon is taking too long,
about 9 months. Is there any plan to lower the BR of the Merkava mk 4m or the namer tzhrihon?
atleast until it is fixed?
There’s no reason to play them over the normal ones, especially the Namer Tzhrihon, since without the Aps, the normal Namer is much better.
1 Like
I wish 9 months was considered “too long”.
1 Like
I know.
and, if they would release a statement saying “this bug is too hard to fix, and we need more time”
i would get it.
but no, they just ignore bug reports, and let us wonder if they will ever fix the issues in the israeli tech tree
They basically did that with the Tornado Flight model and if anything its worse. Because you know it will simply never be looked at ever again. Even if the game limitations they were encountering were fixed
Your question was already answered in the post you responded too it with:
Since then, consideration was made when requests came in for the AIM-9L and the reasons for it not being implemented have been explained both at the time and again today.
Hey. Any planned BR changes would be within the current proposals.
A little more then year i waiting since my ahead shells report was considered. Well. I think there are still many reports in this state. They are forgotten maybe, maybe they didn’t want to fix it. Here, take another premium pack and make it silent for a while…
1 Like
uh next gen missiles are r73m , python4 , aim9m-10. mica ir will bully every other IIR missile in game aam5 ,pl10,9x,asraam , r74m cus it simply outranges everything , has datalink , rafale can carry 8 of those.
1 Like