Over 800 comments, I expected something
The humble VFM-5
SoonTM
They where preocupied with the preparations for the C&P Thai Subtree we got last winter.
I got some pretty aggressive feelings regarding the VFM5 being TT but both the CCVL and XM8 not being TT. I won’t be allowed to chat anymore so I’ll keep them to myself.
Yeah that sucks, I have a sneaking suspicion that it’s because not too many people have that vehicle, and the people who do have it don’t know that it’s supposed to have blow out panels, so it doesn’t get much attention.
Eh, depends.
Ship baffles, thermoclines, ambient sea noise, water disturbed by depth charges, larger ships such as battleships having basically no anti-submarine systems, and ships with anti submarine systems like sonar need to slow right down to get any decent utilisation from them, all gives submarines a really strong position.
However, Submarines are not speed demons, some destroyers in game such as the daring class could carry extremely effective anti sub weapons like the squid mortar, others carry the hedgehog which doesn’t disturb the water in the first place, also the RBU-6000 just generally, some frigates in game have passive guided torpedoes such as HMS Blackpool.
And that’s just with what’s currently in game, destroyers or cruisers with ASROC, helicopters, and towed sonar arrays would pose serious challenges to submarines. But then again, submarines in this era have passive, active, wire guided, and wake homing torpedoes. As well as dropped and tube launched decoys.
Now I wish this was the start of the dev blog season
I mean i heard from some sources that the cdk allowed exporting 3d models once.
And since people kinda do it anyway just using other methods.
Actually how about u guys open tickets for only the specific vehicles which have incorrect models or bugs, and then you can accept bug fixes from the community and pay thrm in currency or GE etc
Hey @Smin1080p_WT Smin, could you help me forward this report? About the Namer engine horsepower // Gaijin.net // Issues
Hello.
Yes, soon tm ))
Remember when you had yours too?
Good times ))
Hey. This source is not specific as to which Namer variants will receive this upgraded engine.
Hey @Smin1080p_WT can i ask you something about Yamatos shells?
That we didnt recive its Beehive shells due to the game engine not be able to handel all the fragments etc is fine by me, but couldt we have get in exchange its 46cm Typ 0 HE Ordinary shell with a Time fuze for AA purposes?
Since in the U.S Report O-17 its stated that 2 Time Fuze variants (Typ 0 Mechanical Time Fuze and Type 4 modification 1 mechanical Time Fuze) were compatible with all 20cm Ordinary HE shells and upwards for AA purposes.
Should i try to report/suggest that?
A suggestion report can be made for shells compatible / used with its guns.
In terms of procurement quantity, it covers all the Namer vehicles currently in IDF possession, and the Namer variants already in the game are also based on existing army Namer modifications. If you find this explanation insufficient, would you please forward it as a suggestion?
Magazine is online. That means something is probably going to happen soon.
Question: You’ve said vehicle name bug reports are considered suggestions before.
Is that the same for incorrect operator nation ones?