Not in the immediate future. Nothing to speak of currently.
1 Like
And this tree would have less players compared to Israel because not many people are interested in these niche nations.
So why spend the massive amount of money developing and modeling these 400 unique vehicles is its going to bee the least played nation in the game.
puts on snail targeted hypnosis music, and sways a golden eagle on a string
yes yes, the Snail should rest and give us a “Copy Paste” FV101, yes yes, its just a basic gun swap, you can even put it in three trees! ez pz!
1 Like
Should have something to do with the last remaining options. We all would like a Swiss tech tree with years of original vehicle development
Ah I’ve misread your previous message, mb there. (in game ;P)
3 Likes
Useless and weakest IFV in game.
WW1 stuff.
Indian fighter aircraft gets air spawn, but Buc S1, the unarmed bomber doesnt.
Still doesnt work. Plenty of reports of helis taking multiple direct hits and suffering no damage. It takes on average 3+ missiles per target.
Again:
Air Sim? Nothing
Top tier ground? Nothing
Naval? Amazing top tier addition, rendered unplayable by a stupidly OP soviet paper ship.
I wont be grinding another ground tree because ground RP rewards are god aweful. So I guess im stuck with unplayable vehicles
I wont be grinding another naval tree, because it takes too long and unless its soviets. Rank VIII is unplayable
I dont play Air Sim anymore, because its been abandoned by the devs and Air RB gets stale after 2 matches.
What has been added of note.
10 Likes
No new content ig ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Content for popular nations where money is spent ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Indeed, with all the space, Gaijin is at least forced to add a few completely new vehicles, as TT. Something that well, dose happen sometimes with STs, feels even more of an uphill battle.
If only they would add unique stuff for those nations as well
2 Likes
Are you dumb? Not only I did not call all those 400 vehicles unique but nation like Czechoslovakia would be much, much more popular compared to nations such as Israel. Just go look at tademats suggestion and the amount of people supporting it.
4 Likes
No guarantee in that is there?
4 Likes
You said nothing unique was added to Britain, which is not just factually untrue but incredibly disingenuous.
I appreciate vehicles may not be something personally you wanted, but that does not mean they didn’t exist or happen or that others did want to see them.
Constantly being negative on every British addition, every fix that is deployed and pretending like nothing is added or fixed sadly isn’t going to improve anything for the better.
6 Likes
I highly doubt it.
2 Likes
4 Likes
Typo mb, unless there was some supersecret project I accidentally named.
This forum is an extremely small demographic of WT players.
just because lots of people on this site wants or supports it doesn’t mean that the 99% of the player base that’s not on here will be interested.
Hell 95% of WT players wouldn’t be able to point to Checkoslovakia on map or the fact that’s its not even a single nation anymore
2 Likes
Its not the strongest, but its far from useless. Looks at nuke in it.
I wouldnt call it the weakest IFV in game went the Ratel 20 and the BTR-80 exist
1 Like
2 Likes
Its hard not.
Anything dependent on BOL is still screwed at the moment (that is 7/8 rank VIII aircraft)
Typhoon added 8 months ago. Only got a usable radar a few weeks ago and its still underperforming loads accross the board
Tonka? Still got a load of outstanding issues
Harriers? Still got load of outstanding issues
Hunters? Still got loads of issues
Into ground:
CR2 barely playable, with no competitive supporting line-up. Why the hell Italy and Britain didnt get SPAA last major was an insane decision
Into Naval:
Could have been an amazing update. Totally ruinned by giving the soviets something so unimaginably OP that its rendered top tier unplayable… Again… Should have learnt after Scharnhorst.
4 Likes