Well, Benelux was a very strong contender for its independent TT, yet it became a sub-TT with the majority of its additions being only one of the few C&P vehicles.
I think Yugoslavia will become the exact same, perhaps for a Poland-Eastern Europe TT.
Where did you get that? 😂
The difference is, Benelux added just a handful of vehicles, you’re asking for almost an entire region of a continent with their own large pool of vehicles to be added to a single tree, what do you think that’s supposed to look like XD.
I think the sub tree rework by mauswaffe is the best alternative.
3 Likes
Cough China Cough : P
But as I say they can add Yugoslavia will all ex nations as one then do a Scandinavian style and as a Slavic union as a sub tree Benelux style
1 Like
Oh, yes, in WTM already ASM…
1 Like
Caspian Sea Monster 👀
1 Like
Community Bug Reporting System I hope they will fix this bug of aircraft that fire single pop countermeasures but fires twice unintentionally (yes I just made the bug report but it can be quite an issue)
I’m wondering how it will control.
(On another note, don’t gajin have the rights (or at least involved) with game game modern warships? Maybe that’s how we have several ashm ships already while main game doesn’t?)
People here tend to forget that the forums is but a fairly insignificant part of the entire WT playerbase. A vast majority of people who play this game most likely dont give a flying duck where a vehicle or nation goes…
Personally i just want interesting and unique vehicle’s which is why i think people pushing for some form of an “eastern european” tech tree are going to be massively disappointed when its all largely copy and paste vehicles with unique and interesting stuff being locked behind an event or premium wall with only a few top tiers being unique.
And of course gaijin will say “we will add “X” eventually” only for it to get added 5 years later when its DOA.
5 Likes
ecranoplano md-160
I do genuinely hope it is because it would make my grinding of the JP ground tree just that much more worth it. Not holding my breath though.
Ekranoplan my beloved
Unfortunately it will never happen, gaijin made the KV-1A a vehicle which sits at 4.7 without a lineup ,unless you like a 4.7 SPAA thats a better TD than SPAA, a 4.0 TD, a 4.0 TD, and a 4.0 TD and a 4.0 T34…
Also the Kungstiger was realistically the replacement and Finland could give 2 heavy tanks so the Kungstiger replaces the KV-1B so sweden could get 2 heavies. Nobody asked for the Kungstiger and Unfortunately its here because gaijin doesn’t want Finland to actually have one of its more important vehicles during the Continuation War. Just like why the Sturmi still isnt here despite the tree being added what 3 years ago now? Finland was a last minute C&P slop fest where gaijin could’ve added actually unique Finnish models of vehicles but went the route of giving the bare minimum same as every other TT aside from SA. The whole locked event vehicle thing is the most redundant system and the snail could earn far more money if they added them to their correct nation.
3 Likes
This might just be me, but I’d rather want to see Gaijin lean hard into the “It’s not a Russian tree, Soviet Union means all post-Soviet states” than to make Czech or Slovak subtrees for USSR. I just really hate the idea of Czechoslovak subtree for USSR.
If there really needs to be USSR subtrees the order of priorities should be:
- Actual post-Soviet states (minus Ukraine for current events, also maybe pick some that are pro-Russia now too like Belarus)
- Close Allies with no potential of their own tree or combined trees
That’s it, if that’s somehow still not enough then tough luck, the USSR tree isn’t exactly in need of subtrees anyways.
9 Likes
Like that would be any less controversial
2 Likes
What do you mean by Slavic union?
Ofcourse, Russia will never need a sub-TT, but they will get one eventually.
Atleast, knowing Gaijin, i suspect it.
I would say, lets first get ALL nations on 300 vehicles first and then continue the trend of adding new TT’s etc…
Since most nations still lack “good” lineups, e.g. having an SPAAG and 3 tanks in a single lineup at the same br. Some nations are still lacking competitive br lineups.
2 Likes