You don’t understand the tab system we are thinking off, if we add tabs then all of that nations vehicles say Thailand every tech from Thailand will move into that tab. So not only leaving more space in the main Japanese tree but letting people the option to grind Thai stuff, if they don’t want to then they are free to ignore them : )
1 Like
I agree. But not doing that means less effort for Gaijin and the chance to, as I already mentioned, further incentivize spending money on the grind.
That being said I also don’t like the mindless copy-paste they do just for the sake of adding vehicles. (Belguim/Netherlands in France??? Not any of the dozen or so former French colonies? Or any of the multitude of French production/prototype vehicles either? Really??? What a sick joke)
The main thing for me is, is that there clearly no rules or set of requirements for what can and can’t be a sub. It’s just either BvvD or whom ever is the lead dev chooses in that moment on what is a sub.
As I say Australia was a good candidate to be a sub as it got around 14 vehicles already in Britain but yet India only having a handful at the time and the call was made for it to be a sub
New devblog from WT Mobile:
They did mention in the devstream that ASTER 30 was in development on the land-based platform, so maybe it 's not totally surprising that ships using it have been in development too.
The 30mm guns are present, while the 20mm CIWS turrets are hidden from view as usual:
3 Likes
I’m still appalled they picked India over literally any other country for Britain. Like, yes, certainly British players will want an Indian T-90.
1 Like
Tbf Finland is a pretty bad option, you have the worst 14.0 and the one thats is better in nearly everyway is the same BR and not foldered. Finland essentially got the middle finger every update when it came to air, it suprises me that people continue to think the F-18C was every a good addition when we could’ve gotten the MLU 1 or 2 6 months ago. Also worst Mig 21 of the bunch but its such a minor thing it doesn’t matter imo.
Ive been waiting for Sweden air to get something that stays competitive and isn’t immediately overshadowed for years and we have yet to get anything like that. Its why i went and Finished my Russian air and started working on Italy. I wanted nations that were actively getting stuff. Britain is kinda meh since i have what i want which is the Jaguar and Harriers and when we get the Hawks and (cope) the vulcan ill be satisfied.
Oh thank you for reminding, the reason why the T-90 existed was because our MBT’s were niche, like excuse me but isn’t every MBT niche baring the Leo and the T series ?
Depends on playstyle, i think Leos are overated but thats because i prefer fast mobility over every other trait. Japanese tanks are peak for me
Bar that god awful turret rotation 30°/s vomit
I’m just fed up at this point, yeah I like subs but I just want a better system now to add them
1 Like
Id like if subs were chosen based on what they can add now and not 4 years from now. I think Finland was a worthless addition and still think it is as literally any other sub would’ve been a better choice for a more immediate fix to air and some ground areas. Finland after 1 patch undid everything it fixed by killing the 3.7 f2p lineup and failed to bolster existing lineups until you got to areas where Sweden was already well rounded. One of the worst design choices ive ever scene because it makes me wonder if they did any amount of thinking before changing things. At least with hungary they sorta fixed their short comings.
Isn’t that also the reason France received the Dutch Leopards? Like, yeah, France does have an MBT problem, but its the lack of stabilizers until 9.3 that’s the issue, not the Leclercs.
Countries like Tunisia with their M60A1 should’ve been put in instead of more Leopards at a BR they’re not needed.
It makes some sense if it the first addition wasn’t a T-90, and we were still mid cold war top-tier wise, a lot of their early-mid coldwar stuff was British/or made to order by the British. At this point it’s a bit stupid, but what ever, I’m over it now. Now what pisses me off is the just lack of Indian additions. Sue me I’m a fan of making Historically themed line ups: How the hell am I going to make a well rounded and fun line up with one ten-seven MBT, an eight-three MBT, an (in GRB) eleven-seven fighter, an eleven-three attacker, and a handful of SAMs? Just ah yes the one death leaver line up of T-90 + CAS + SAMs woooo so fun.
If you wanted to make a historically accurate ground lineup why on earth did you pick one of the smallest subtrees to do it with?
… My point was Gaijin need to add more Indian things and actually flesh out the subtree so someone if they where inclined could make a historical line up Kinda like South African Air but thats a different conversation
2 Likes
Don’t get me started on the lack of SA air : (
1 Like
It’s the only thing my ZA line up is really missing
Don’t really want to uptier the Olifant Mk.2 & Rooikat Mk.1D up so high to use the Gripen
Though it might also end up incidentally missing the Badger
1 Like
I absolutely agree! Gaijin can push ships, you know where? SHIPS - CANNOT BE AIMED MANUALLY, The set function buttons do not work again after the update! AUTOMATICS AIM INTENTIONALLY AIM NEXT TO IT AGAIN, corrections do not work, aiming methods do not respond!! And you gave Bismarck a total fart when I do not shoot a Light Cruiser at 6 kilometers… Sorry… Same Westfalen and Bayern! I normally ended the game ALT+F4… You have a mistake on the map of Britain, where I was flying with Germans under textures when approaching the airport, FIX IT! I swear at planes, but they are the only ones playable.
Is “game not ready” for CIWS in WTM?
Oooh…thats a very modern warship. Cant wait to see Maya class