Tying to justify 70km SAM’s would require a bit of time indeed
Don’t lol
How many controversies? Less than 5 or more than 5?
Now iam convinced that we need these
2 Likes
70 is one thing
2 Likes
It’s like adding Serbian vehicles to the USA.
27 Likes
Or Iranian vehicles
Oh no, please not a strange sub placement
As bad as adding Pakistan to the Indian sub tree for Britain?
Controversial sub tree confirmed?
3 Likes
Oh OH, is it what I’m thinking it could be 🤔
9 Likes
2 Likes
So something like South Korean vehicles to Japan, that’s the only matching controversies I can think off with Serbian vehicles to the US
8 Likes
What other “controversial” sub tree’s we have in mind?
South korea to Japan?
It’s Like adding Serbian Vehicles or it is adding Serbian Vehicles to the USA
2 Likes
ha long range, but at least it must be slow so it can still be avoid…
checks speed
nevermind
Egypt or Iraq sub maybe?
To Britain so we can have a KA-50 lol
Iran and Iraq joint nation because they dont’ want to waste their WWM assets lol
Yeah but that man with the AK would be OP. Russian made weapon so it’s bound to have some obscure leaflet saying it can shoot through 1km of steel