I do
(Regardless I would love to see all the Yugoslavia vehicles, including the naval forces. Besides Israel has at most 3 options for Bluewater (unless there were major refits) so that precedent is set).
9 Likes
I did too…
Until Soyuz. That thing immediately killed my interest for Naval.
Imagine finally getting to play with real, legendary, veteran ships that sailed the seas and fought… only to be clowned by some impossibly optimistic iteration of a project that could have never been completed as specified by the designs on paper for technical and industrial limitations.
If Soyuz was at least on par with Iowa and Yamato, it would be fine… but it’s just on a whole different league. It’s not even on the same sport. It’s ridiculous.
EDIT: NOT this post being flag-spammed for being “abusive and offensive” LMFAO
8 Likes
Please tell me that work was made on a prototype, I don’t want to feel the same disappointment as I did with the Skorpion
Well the tables may turn as that means the Lion, H-39 and A-150 can all join.
Also the joys and whimsy playing arcade coastal (granted you can find a game in under 4 minutes, I somehow managed to get a ton of coastal games today).
1 Like
H-39 is just a Bismarck with marginally better firepower, and A-150 was never laid down, so it’s not eligible for ingame implementation (just like Montana).
Lion could be neat, though!
True, but one it’s guns were made so it’s apparently eligible.
2 Likes
what next, a bucket of paint for the Montana was made?
1 Like
also the hull.
Don’t argue with me, talk with the suggestion moderators, already tried to check if the Montana was eligible but they said no parts specific to it was made.
they made the improved 5" guns for the Montanas, but they got repurposed for the Midways after Montana was cancelled
but it isnt certain whether those used on Midway were originally made for Montana, or it they were made for Midway, since the planned mount for the Montana was twin mounts like the 5/38 on Iowa but the ones on Midway are single gun
1 Like
Nothing of the Montana was made. It was a model only. The A-150 qualifies as a unfinished proto due to unique parts being made specifically for it. If something was made and got used for something else, then I dont think it counts to the unique stuff, but I aint sure
1 Like
I’m pretty sure your right, I remember seeing this point used when someone was attempting to suggest the IJN Zipang.
All the more reason to add it
I am fiending for more MiG content
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
7 Likes
I hadn’t seen my fan in while tbh, props because he’s not posted since October last year : P
1 Like
We could get the F/A-18E block 1 foldered with the C late since it gets the same avionics, just more payload at the cost of flight performance
Block 2 or 3 would be superior though since it gets better avionics and armament
the thing is the F-18 is already subpar in that regard and i dont think that more missiles will help there
1 Like
Exxxxxxcept… if it’s classed as a strike aircraft. And imo that can very much work, hornets were always meant as fighters AND attackers
thing is that we have platforms that can do both jobs better
the F-15E is a far better striker and also far more capable in missile combat
Well if you follow that logic they may as well not add the superhornets at all